From: wen.yang@linux.dev
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-rt-devel@list.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>,
Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 06/15] net: optimize ____napi_schedule() to avoid extra NET_RX_SOFTIRQ
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 01:58:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f76c6813e6f8d0b7060db8344a9fb2a4ff765d69.1791912669.git.wen.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1791912669.git.wen.yang@linux.dev>
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
commit 8b43fd3d1d7d88293eb15e92090826e6b7cc13e4 upstream.
____napi_schedule() adds a napi into current cpu softnet_data poll_list,
then raises NET_RX_SOFTIRQ to make sure net_rx_action() will process it.
Idea of this patch is to not raise NET_RX_SOFTIRQ when being called indirectly
from net_rx_action(), because we can process poll_list from this point,
without going to full softirq loop.
This needs a change in net_rx_action() to make sure we restart
its main loop if sd->poll_list was updated without NET_RX_SOFTIRQ
being raised.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
---
net/core/dev.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 10a8883ae490..db1fe85ebc90 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4498,7 +4498,11 @@ static inline void ____napi_schedule(struct softnet_data *sd,
}
list_add_tail(&napi->poll_list, &sd->poll_list);
- raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
+ /* If not called from net_rx_action()
+ * we have to raise NET_RX_SOFTIRQ.
+ */
+ if (!sd->in_net_rx_action)
+ raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
@@ -6797,6 +6801,7 @@ static __latent_entropy void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
LIST_HEAD(list);
LIST_HEAD(repoll);
+start:
sd->in_net_rx_action = true;
local_irq_disable();
list_splice_init(&sd->poll_list, &list);
@@ -6808,9 +6813,18 @@ static __latent_entropy void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
skb_defer_free_flush(sd);
if (list_empty(&list)) {
- sd->in_net_rx_action = false;
- if (!sd_has_rps_ipi_waiting(sd) && list_empty(&repoll))
- goto end;
+ if (list_empty(&repoll)) {
+ sd->in_net_rx_action = false;
+ barrier();
+ /* We need to check if ____napi_schedule()
+ * had refilled poll_list while
+ * sd->in_net_rx_action was true.
+ */
+ if (!list_empty(&sd->poll_list))
+ goto start;
+ if (!sd_has_rps_ipi_waiting(sd))
+ goto end;
+ }
break;
}
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 17:58 [PATCH v6.1-rt 00/15] net: Backport backlog-NAPI threads to resolve PREEMPT_RT softirq warning in SMP flush wen.yang
2026-10-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 01/15] Revert "net: Avoid the IPI to free the" wen.yang
2026-10-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 02/15] net: avoid irqsave in skb_defer_free_flush wen.yang
2026-10-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 03/15] net: napi_schedule_rps() cleanup wen.yang
2026-10-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 04/15] net: add softnet_data.in_net_rx_action wen.yang
2026-10-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 05/15] net: optimize napi_schedule_rps() wen.yang
2026-10-13 17:58 ` wen.yang [this message]
2026-10-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 07/15] net: add debugging checks in skb_attempt_defer_free() wen.yang
2026-10-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 08/15] net: do not provide hard irq safety for sd->defer_lock wen.yang
2026-10-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 09/15] net: move skb_defer_free_flush() up wen.yang
2026-10-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 10/15] net: make napi_threaded_poll() aware of sd->defer_list wen.yang
2026-10-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 11/15] net: optimize napi_threaded_poll() vs RPS/RFS wen.yang
2026-10-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 12/15] net: Remove conditional threaded-NAPI wakeup based on task state wen.yang
2026-10-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 13/15] net: Use backlog-NAPI to clean up the defer_list wen.yang
2026-10-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 14/15] net: Allow to use SMP threads for backlog NAPI wen.yang
2026-10-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 15/15] net: Rename rps_lock to backlog_lock wen.yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f76c6813e6f8d0b7060db8344a9fb2a4ff765d69.1791912669.git.wen.yang@linux.dev \
--to=wen.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@list.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®