[PATCH] perf topdown: Don't require config1==0 for a slots event

[PATCH] perf topdown: Don't require config1==0 for a slots event

[Zide Chen]

arch_is_topdown_slots() requires config1 == 0, so it misidentified
"cpu/slots,metrics_clear=1/" as not being the slots event, and an
additional slots event gets inserted, which fails event scheduling
since the group now needs two fixed counter 3.

  $ perf stat -e "{cpu/slots,metrics_clear=1/,cpu/topdown-retiring/}" -- sleep 1
  WARNING: events were regrouped to match PMUs
       <not counted>      slots
     <not supported>      cpu/slots,metrics_clear=1/
       <not counted>      cpu/topdown-retiring/

Drop the config1 == 0 check from arch_is_topdown_slots(). This is
safe: config1 has no bearing on the event's identifying config value
(TOPDOWN_SLOTS, 0x0400).

The attr.type == PERF_TYPE_RAW check is what actually matters: only the
core PMU is registered with PERF_TYPE_RAW, and on x86, 0x400 is
guaranteed to be slots event on core CPU.

arch_is_topdown_metrics() keeps its own config1 == 0 check, since
genuine metrics events have no "metrics_clear" and config1 remains 0.

Add a test verifying that an explicit "slots,metrics_clear=1" event in
a group does not trigger an extra slots event injection.

Fixes: 5b546de9cc17 ("perf topdown: Use attribute to see an event is a topdown metic or slots")
Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
---
 tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/topdown.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c  |  3 +--
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/topdown.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/topdown.c
index 2b6f47ce4932..b1ce9f83db00 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/topdown.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/topdown.c
@@ -229,10 +229,38 @@ static int test__x86_topdown_slots_injection(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unu
 	return TEST_OK;
 }
 
+/*
+ * An explicit "slots,metrics_clear=1" event is still the slots event and
+ * must not cause an extra slots event to be injected into the group.
+ */
+static int test__x86_topdown_metrics_clear(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
+					   int subtest __maybe_unused)
+{
+	struct perf_pmu *pmu;
+	char event_str[128];
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!topdown_sys_has_perf_metrics())
+		return TEST_OK;
+
+	pmu = perf_pmus__find_by_type(PERF_TYPE_RAW);
+	if (!pmu || !perf_pmu__has_format(pmu, "metrics_clear"))
+		return TEST_OK;
+
+	snprintf(event_str, sizeof(event_str),
+		 "{%s/slots,metrics_clear=1/,%s/topdown-retiring/}",
+		 pmu->name, pmu->name);
+	ret = test_sort(event_str, 2, 1);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("explicit metrics_clear slots event isn't duplicated", ret, TEST_OK);
+
+	return TEST_OK;
+}
+
 static struct test_case x86_topdown_tests[] = {
 	TEST_CASE("topdown events", x86_topdown),
 	TEST_CASE("topdown sorting", x86_topdown_sorting),
 	TEST_CASE("topdown slots injection", x86_topdown_slots_injection),
+	TEST_CASE("topdown metrics_clear no extra slots", x86_topdown_metrics_clear),
 	{ .name = NULL, }
 };
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
index bafd285119d7..64bc64e335a2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
@@ -37,8 +37,7 @@ bool topdown_sys_has_perf_metrics(void)
 bool arch_is_topdown_slots(const struct evsel *evsel)
 {
 	return evsel->core.attr.type == PERF_TYPE_RAW &&
-	       evsel->core.attr.config == TOPDOWN_SLOTS &&
-	       evsel->core.attr.config1 == 0;
+	       evsel->core.attr.config == TOPDOWN_SLOTS;
 }
 
 bool arch_is_topdown_metrics(const struct evsel *evsel)
-- 
2.55.0

Re: [PATCH] perf topdown: Don't require config1==0 for a slots event

[Ian Rogers]

On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 1:37 PM Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>
> arch_is_topdown_slots() requires config1 == 0, so it misidentified
> "cpu/slots,metrics_clear=1/" as not being the slots event, and an
> additional slots event gets inserted, which fails event scheduling
> since the group now needs two fixed counter 3.
>
>   $ perf stat -e "{cpu/slots,metrics_clear=1/,cpu/topdown-retiring/}" -- sleep 1
>   WARNING: events were regrouped to match PMUs
>        <not counted>      slots
>      <not supported>      cpu/slots,metrics_clear=1/
>        <not counted>      cpu/topdown-retiring/
>
> Drop the config1 == 0 check from arch_is_topdown_slots(). This is
> safe: config1 has no bearing on the event's identifying config value
> (TOPDOWN_SLOTS, 0x0400).
>
> The attr.type == PERF_TYPE_RAW check is what actually matters: only the
> core PMU is registered with PERF_TYPE_RAW, and on x86, 0x400 is
> guaranteed to be slots event on core CPU.
>
> arch_is_topdown_metrics() keeps its own config1 == 0 check, since
> genuine metrics events have no "metrics_clear" and config1 remains 0.
>
> Add a test verifying that an explicit "slots,metrics_clear=1" event in
> a group does not trigger an extra slots event injection.
>
> Fixes: 5b546de9cc17 ("perf topdown: Use attribute to see an event is a topdown metic or slots")
> Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>

Note, there's a Sashiko warning about a potentially missing #include
for musl compatibility that maybe you or Arnaldo could address.

Thanks,
Ian

> ---
>  tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/topdown.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c  |  3 +--
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/topdown.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/topdown.c
> index 2b6f47ce4932..b1ce9f83db00 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/topdown.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/topdown.c
> @@ -229,10 +229,38 @@ static int test__x86_topdown_slots_injection(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unu
>         return TEST_OK;
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * An explicit "slots,metrics_clear=1" event is still the slots event and
> + * must not cause an extra slots event to be injected into the group.
> + */
> +static int test__x86_topdown_metrics_clear(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
> +                                          int subtest __maybe_unused)
> +{
> +       struct perf_pmu *pmu;
> +       char event_str[128];
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       if (!topdown_sys_has_perf_metrics())
> +               return TEST_OK;
> +
> +       pmu = perf_pmus__find_by_type(PERF_TYPE_RAW);
> +       if (!pmu || !perf_pmu__has_format(pmu, "metrics_clear"))
> +               return TEST_OK;
> +
> +       snprintf(event_str, sizeof(event_str),
> +                "{%s/slots,metrics_clear=1/,%s/topdown-retiring/}",
> +                pmu->name, pmu->name);
> +       ret = test_sort(event_str, 2, 1);
> +       TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("explicit metrics_clear slots event isn't duplicated", ret, TEST_OK);
> +
> +       return TEST_OK;
> +}
> +
>  static struct test_case x86_topdown_tests[] = {
>         TEST_CASE("topdown events", x86_topdown),
>         TEST_CASE("topdown sorting", x86_topdown_sorting),
>         TEST_CASE("topdown slots injection", x86_topdown_slots_injection),
> +       TEST_CASE("topdown metrics_clear no extra slots", x86_topdown_metrics_clear),
>         { .name = NULL, }
>  };
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
> index bafd285119d7..64bc64e335a2 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
> @@ -37,8 +37,7 @@ bool topdown_sys_has_perf_metrics(void)
>  bool arch_is_topdown_slots(const struct evsel *evsel)
>  {
>         return evsel->core.attr.type == PERF_TYPE_RAW &&
> -              evsel->core.attr.config == TOPDOWN_SLOTS &&
> -              evsel->core.attr.config1 == 0;
> +              evsel->core.attr.config == TOPDOWN_SLOTS;
>  }
>
>  bool arch_is_topdown_metrics(const struct evsel *evsel)
> --
> 2.55.0
>

Re: [PATCH] perf topdown: Don't require config1==0 for a slots event

[Mi, Dapeng]

LGTM. Thanks.

Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

On 9/17/2026 4:27 AM, Zide Chen wrote:
> arch_is_topdown_slots() requires config1 == 0, so it misidentified
> "cpu/slots,metrics_clear=1/" as not being the slots event, and an
> additional slots event gets inserted, which fails event scheduling
> since the group now needs two fixed counter 3.
>
>   $ perf stat -e "{cpu/slots,metrics_clear=1/,cpu/topdown-retiring/}" -- sleep 1
>   WARNING: events were regrouped to match PMUs
>        <not counted>      slots
>      <not supported>      cpu/slots,metrics_clear=1/
>        <not counted>      cpu/topdown-retiring/
>
> Drop the config1 == 0 check from arch_is_topdown_slots(). This is
> safe: config1 has no bearing on the event's identifying config value
> (TOPDOWN_SLOTS, 0x0400).
>
> The attr.type == PERF_TYPE_RAW check is what actually matters: only the
> core PMU is registered with PERF_TYPE_RAW, and on x86, 0x400 is
> guaranteed to be slots event on core CPU.
>
> arch_is_topdown_metrics() keeps its own config1 == 0 check, since
> genuine metrics events have no "metrics_clear" and config1 remains 0.
>
> Add a test verifying that an explicit "slots,metrics_clear=1" event in
> a group does not trigger an extra slots event injection.
>
> Fixes: 5b546de9cc17 ("perf topdown: Use attribute to see an event is a topdown metic or slots")
> Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/topdown.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c  |  3 +--
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/topdown.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/topdown.c
> index 2b6f47ce4932..b1ce9f83db00 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/topdown.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/topdown.c
> @@ -229,10 +229,38 @@ static int test__x86_topdown_slots_injection(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unu
>  	return TEST_OK;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * An explicit "slots,metrics_clear=1" event is still the slots event and
> + * must not cause an extra slots event to be injected into the group.
> + */
> +static int test__x86_topdown_metrics_clear(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
> +					   int subtest __maybe_unused)
> +{
> +	struct perf_pmu *pmu;
> +	char event_str[128];
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!topdown_sys_has_perf_metrics())
> +		return TEST_OK;
> +
> +	pmu = perf_pmus__find_by_type(PERF_TYPE_RAW);
> +	if (!pmu || !perf_pmu__has_format(pmu, "metrics_clear"))
> +		return TEST_OK;
> +
> +	snprintf(event_str, sizeof(event_str),
> +		 "{%s/slots,metrics_clear=1/,%s/topdown-retiring/}",
> +		 pmu->name, pmu->name);
> +	ret = test_sort(event_str, 2, 1);
> +	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("explicit metrics_clear slots event isn't duplicated", ret, TEST_OK);
> +
> +	return TEST_OK;
> +}
> +
>  static struct test_case x86_topdown_tests[] = {
>  	TEST_CASE("topdown events", x86_topdown),
>  	TEST_CASE("topdown sorting", x86_topdown_sorting),
>  	TEST_CASE("topdown slots injection", x86_topdown_slots_injection),
> +	TEST_CASE("topdown metrics_clear no extra slots", x86_topdown_metrics_clear),
>  	{ .name = NULL, }
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
> index bafd285119d7..64bc64e335a2 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/topdown.c
> @@ -37,8 +37,7 @@ bool topdown_sys_has_perf_metrics(void)
>  bool arch_is_topdown_slots(const struct evsel *evsel)
>  {
>  	return evsel->core.attr.type == PERF_TYPE_RAW &&
> -	       evsel->core.attr.config == TOPDOWN_SLOTS &&
> -	       evsel->core.attr.config1 == 0;
> +	       evsel->core.attr.config == TOPDOWN_SLOTS;
>  }
>  
>  bool arch_is_topdown_metrics(const struct evsel *evsel)