From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>,
yukuai3@huawei.com, axboe@kernel.dk, bvanassche@acm.org,
ming.lei@redhat.com, hare@suse.de
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
johnny.chenyi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] blk-mq: fix elevator depth_updated method
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 17:51:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98b30bef-3f7c-411b-b724-ed614a86b056@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250821060612.1729939-2-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
On 8/21/25 11:36 AM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>
> Current depth_updated has some problems:
>
> 1) depth_updated() will be called for each hctx, while all elevators
> will update async_depth for the disk level, this is not related to hctx;
> 2) In blk_mq_update_nr_requests(), if previous hctx update succeed and
> this hctx update failed, q->nr_requests will not be updated, while
> async_depth is already updated with new nr_reqeuests in previous
> depth_updated();
> 3) All elevators are using q->nr_requests to calculate async_depth now,
> however, q->nr_requests is still the old value when depth_updated() is
> called from blk_mq_update_nr_requests();
>
> Those problems are first from error path, then mq-deadline, and recently
> for bfq and kyber, fix those problems by:
>
> - pass in request_queue instead of hctx;
> - move depth_updated() after q->nr_requests is updated in
> blk_mq_update_nr_requests();
> - add depth_updated() call inside init_sched() method to initialize
> async_depth;
> - remove init_hctx() method for mq-deadline and bfq that is useless now;
>
> Fixes: 77f1e0a52d26 ("bfq: update internal depth state when queue depth changes")
> Fixes: 39823b47bbd4 ("block/mq-deadline: Fix the tag reservation code")
> Fixes: 42e6c6ce03fd ("lib/sbitmap: convert shallow_depth from one word to the whole sbitmap")
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-21 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-21 6:06 [PATCH v3 0/2] blk-mq: fix update nr_requests regressions Yu Kuai
2025-08-21 6:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] blk-mq: fix elevator depth_updated method Yu Kuai
2025-08-21 12:21 ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2025-08-21 14:57 ` Li Nan
2025-08-22 6:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-21 6:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] blk-mq: fix blk_mq_tags double free while nr_requests grown Yu Kuai
2025-08-21 14:57 ` Li Nan
2025-08-22 6:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-26 6:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] blk-mq: fix update nr_requests regressions Yu Kuai
2025-09-05 7:20 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-05 19:52 ` Jens Axboe
2025-09-05 19:54 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98b30bef-3f7c-411b-b724-ed614a86b056@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=johnny.chenyi@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®