From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Jagadeesh Kona <jagadeesh.kona@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Ajit Pandey <ajit.pandey@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Taniya Das <taniya.das@oss.qualcomm.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: SM8750: Enable CPUFreq support
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 15:43:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <99796cc0-f29b-40d0-b8bb-ebcbcc950b23@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f10ade51-b29f-45cc-9895-d66a319ab26c@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 1/20/26 12:25 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> On 1/20/2026 3:44 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 1/19/26 8:00 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>>> On 12/11/2025 12:32 AM, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
>>>> Add the cpucp mailbox, sram and SCMI nodes required to enable
>>>> the CPUFreq support using the SCMI perf protocol on SM8750 SoCs.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Kona <jagadeesh.kona@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>
>>> Just curious, does this patch enable thermal mitigation for CPU clusters
>>> too?
>>
>> If nothing changed, we have lets-not-explode type mitigations via LMH,
>> but lets-not-burn-the-user would require a skin temp sensor to be
>> wired up, which then could be used to enable some cooling action
>
> In some chipsets, I have noticed that the gpu cooling device throttles
> GPU to the lowest OPP even with not-so-heavy GPU workloads, making it
> unusable-ly slow. My hypothesis was that it was due to unmitigated CPU
> temperature tripping up GPU Tsens.
>
> So, I am wondering if there are any additional CPU cooling related
> changes required to get a reasonable overall performance under thermal
> constraints.
Yes, something like the aforementioned skin-temp sensor at least..
Today Linux will not throttle the CPUs at all (they're not even declared
as cooling devices) and we sorta agreed that in general it's a good thing
(tm), because otherwise we'd be coding in a cooling profile into the SoC
DTSI without taking into account the cooling capabilities of a given end
device (i.e. in an extreme case, a PC with SM8650 with a cooler that's
3kg of aluminium vs a Steam Frame headset where the SoC is centimeters
away from your face)
Currently, we have cooling policies for devices with fans and the only
other action is based on a skin temperature sensor (sc8280xp + x13s).
Everything else is left up to the LMH defaults. AFAIK work is ongoing to
create a more informed solution, that would have to (quite obviously)
live in userland.
Konrad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-20 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-10 19:02 [PATCH 0/2] " Jagadeesh Kona
2025-12-10 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Document SM8750 CPUCP mailbox controller Jagadeesh Kona
2025-12-11 16:57 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-01-18 19:40 ` Jassi Brar
2026-01-20 10:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-01-25 0:47 ` Jassi Brar
2025-12-10 19:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: SM8750: Enable CPUFreq support Jagadeesh Kona
2025-12-10 19:22 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-12-11 10:20 ` Abel Vesa
2025-12-16 9:04 ` Sibi Sankar
2025-12-17 12:26 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-01-19 19:00 ` Akhil P Oommen
2026-01-20 10:14 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-01-20 11:25 ` Akhil P Oommen
2026-01-20 14:43 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2026-01-20 20:54 ` Akhil P Oommen
2026-01-21 11:36 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-01-21 12:47 ` Akhil P Oommen
2026-01-21 12:52 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-01-05 14:07 ` (subset) [PATCH 0/2] " Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=99796cc0-f29b-40d0-b8bb-ebcbcc950b23@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ajit.pandey@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=akhilpo@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imran.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=jagadeesh.kona@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=taniya.das@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®