From: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
elver@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
vschneid@redhat.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor mask assumption
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2022 16:17:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a412be021706d048be6a868d2f7eecf8a239cbe.camel@svanheule.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YsC7qlQba4+VJ3W1@yury-laptop>
On Sat, 2022-07-02 at 14:42 -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 06:08:25PM +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> > On uniprocessor builds, any CPU mask is assumed to contain exactly one
> > CPU (cpu0). This assumption ignores the existence of empty masks,
> > resulting in incorrect behaviour.
> > cpumask_first_zero(), cpumask_next_zero(), and for_each_cpu_not() don't
> > provide behaviour matching the assumption that a UP mask is always "1",
> > and instead provide behaviour matching the empty mask.
> >
> > Drop the incorrectly optimised code and use the generic implementations
> > in all cases.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
>
> Suggested-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
>
To be honest, I was somewhat taken aback by this Suggested-by. I certainly appreciate the feedback
you've provided, and I think the patch has gotten better for it, so I do want to acknowledge that.
During reviews of other patches however, I haven't had a reviewer request this for suggestions that
couldn't be spun off into a separate patch. If you are OK with this patch, a Reviewed-by would
definitely be warranted and seems more appropriate IMHO.
Best,
Sander
> > ---
> >
> > Notes:
> > Changes since v3:
> > - Add back UP-optimised cpumask_local_spread, cpumask_any_distribute,
> > cpumask_any_and_distribute
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Drop UP implementations instead of trying to fix them
> >
> > include/linux/cpumask.h | 99 ++++++++---------------------------------
> > lib/Makefile | 3 +-
> > lib/cpumask.c | 2 +
> > 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> > index fe29ac7cc469..7fbef41b3093 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> > @@ -116,85 +116,6 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int cpumask_check(unsigned int cpu)
> > return cpu;
> > }
> >
> > -#if NR_CPUS == 1
> > -/* Uniprocessor. Assume all masks are "1". */
> > -static inline unsigned int cpumask_first(const struct cpumask *srcp)
> > -{
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline unsigned int cpumask_first_zero(const struct cpumask *srcp)
> > -{
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline unsigned int cpumask_first_and(const struct cpumask *srcp1,
> > - const struct cpumask *srcp2)
> > -{
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline unsigned int cpumask_last(const struct cpumask *srcp)
> > -{
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -/* Valid inputs for n are -1 and 0. */
> > -static inline unsigned int cpumask_next(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
> > -{
> > - return n+1;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_zero(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
> > -{
> > - return n+1;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_and(int n,
> > - const struct cpumask *srcp,
> > - const struct cpumask *andp)
> > -{
> > - return n+1;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask,
> > - int start, bool wrap)
> > -{
> > - /* cpu0 unless stop condition, wrap and at cpu0, then nr_cpumask_bits */
> > - return (wrap && n == 0);
> > -}
> > -
> > -/* cpu must be a valid cpu, ie 0, so there's no other choice. */
> > -static inline unsigned int cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask,
> > - unsigned int cpu)
> > -{
> > - return 1;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
> > -{
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p,
> > - const struct cpumask *src2p) {
> > - return cpumask_first_and(src1p, src2p);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp)
> > -{
> > - return cpumask_first(srcp);
> > -}
> > -
> > -#define for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) \
> > - for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
> > -#define for_each_cpu_not(cpu, mask) \
> > - for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
> > -#define for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, mask, start) \
> > - for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask, (void)(start))
> > -#define for_each_cpu_and(cpu, mask1, mask2) \
> > - for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask1, (void)mask2)
> > -#else
> > /**
> > * cpumask_first - get the first cpu in a cpumask
> > * @srcp: the cpumask pointer
> > @@ -260,10 +181,29 @@ static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_zero(int n, const struct cpumask
> > *srcp)
> >
> > int __pure cpumask_next_and(int n, const struct cpumask *, const struct cpumask *);
> > int __pure cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int cpu);
> > +
> > +#if NR_CPUS == 1
> > +/* Uniprocessor: there is only one valid CPU */
> > +static inline unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p,
> > + const struct cpumask *src2p) {
> > + return cpumask_first_and(src1p, src2p);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp)
> > +{
> > + return cpumask_first(srcp);
> > +}
> > +#else
> > unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node);
> > int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p,
> > const struct cpumask *src2p);
> > int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp);
> > +#endif /* NR_CPUS */
> >
> > /**
> > * for_each_cpu - iterate over every cpu in a mask
> > @@ -324,7 +264,6 @@ extern int cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int start,
> > bool
> > for ((cpu) = -1; \
> > (cpu) = cpumask_next_and((cpu), (mask1), (mask2)), \
> > (cpu) < nr_cpu_ids;)
> > -#endif /* SMP */
> >
> > #define CPU_BITS_NONE \
> > { \
> > diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
> > index f99bf61f8bbc..bcc7e8ea0cde 100644
> > --- a/lib/Makefile
> > +++ b/lib/Makefile
> > @@ -34,10 +34,9 @@ lib-y := ctype.o string.o vsprintf.o cmdline.o \
> > is_single_threaded.o plist.o decompress.o kobject_uevent.o \
> > earlycpio.o seq_buf.o siphash.o dec_and_lock.o \
> > nmi_backtrace.o nodemask.o win_minmax.o memcat_p.o \
> > - buildid.o
> > + buildid.o cpumask.o
> >
> > lib-$(CONFIG_PRINTK) += dump_stack.o
> > -lib-$(CONFIG_SMP) += cpumask.o
> >
> > lib-y += kobject.o klist.o
> > obj-y += lockref.o
> > diff --git a/lib/cpumask.c b/lib/cpumask.c
> > index a971a82d2f43..b9728513a4d4 100644
> > --- a/lib/cpumask.c
> > +++ b/lib/cpumask.c
> > @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ void __init free_bootmem_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t mask)
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > +#if NR_CPUS > 1
> > /**
> > * cpumask_local_spread - select the i'th cpu with local numa cpu's first
> > * @i: index number
> > @@ -279,3 +280,4 @@ int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp)
> > return next;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpumask_any_distribute);
> > +#endif /* NR_CPUS */
> > --
> > 2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-03 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-02 16:08 [PATCH v4 0/5] cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor assumptions Sander Vanheule
2022-07-02 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] x86/cacheinfo: move shared cache map definitions Sander Vanheule
2022-07-02 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor mask assumption Sander Vanheule
2022-07-02 21:42 ` Yury Norov
2022-07-03 14:17 ` Sander Vanheule [this message]
2022-07-02 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] lib/test: Introduce cpumask KUnit test suite Sander Vanheule
2022-07-02 21:45 ` Yury Norov
2022-07-03 7:26 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-07-19 21:31 ` Maíra Canal
2022-07-20 5:24 ` David Gow
2022-07-20 12:43 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-07-20 12:47 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-07-02 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] cpumask: Add UP optimised for_each_*_cpu versions Sander Vanheule
2022-07-02 21:47 ` Yury Norov
2022-07-02 21:50 ` Yury Norov
2022-07-03 7:37 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-07-02 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] cpumask: Update cpumask_next_wrap() signature Sander Vanheule
2022-07-02 20:38 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor assumptions Andrew Morton
2022-07-03 7:50 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-07-03 20:39 ` Andrew Morton
2022-07-10 6:51 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-07-11 20:22 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9a412be021706d048be6a868d2f7eecf8a239cbe.camel@svanheule.net \
--to=sander@svanheule.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®