From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
To: "Hans Reiser" <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Al Viro" <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
reiserfs-dev@namesys.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com,
akpm@osdl.org, "Alexander Zarochentcev" <zam@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: possible recursive locking detected - while running fs operations in loops - 2.6.18-rc2-git5
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:08:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a8748490607300308p7c0eb5afpe9c6305527a608d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44CC0161.60806@namesys.com>
On 30/07/06, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> wrote:
> Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> > On 30/07/06, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Thanks. That's a nice little test suite.
> >> >
> >> Yes, it is quite useful, our developers have added it to the regression
> >> suite....
> >>
> > That's nice.
> >
> > Now how about that lock validator message I managed to tease out?
> >
> > Akpm said "... the reiserfs locking appears to be unneeded - this inode
> > is going down and nobody else can look it up, so what is to be locked
> > against?" - can you comment on that?
> >
> >
> Err, how about Zam handles all locking issues and this is Sunday with
> the family? I know, lame, but he'll answer you on Monday Russian
> time.....;-)
>
:-) Not a problem at all.
--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-30 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-25 22:16 Jesper Juhl
2006-07-25 23:29 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-07-29 22:18 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-07-29 23:08 ` Hans Reiser
2006-07-30 6:17 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-07-30 0:46 ` Hans Reiser
2006-07-30 10:08 ` Jesper Juhl [this message]
2006-07-31 19:34 ` Alexander Zarochentsev
2006-07-26 5:33 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-26 6:32 ` [patch] lockdep: annotate vfs_rmdir for filesystems that take i_mutex in delete_inode Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-26 6:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-26 6:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-26 7:04 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9a8748490607300308p7c0eb5afpe9c6305527a608d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=reiserfs-dev@namesys.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zam@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®