From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: IPv4: ip_options_compile() how can we avoid blowing up on a NULL skb???
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 23:34:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a8748490611161434oc393db0o1e1c23ba99b1c796@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
In net/ipv4/ip_options.c::ip_options_compile() we have the following
code at the start of the function :
int ip_options_compile(struct ip_options * opt, struct sk_buff * skb)
{
int l;
unsigned char * iph;
unsigned char * optptr;
int optlen;
unsigned char * pp_ptr = NULL;
struct rtable *rt = skb ? (struct rtable*)skb->dst : NULL;
if (!opt) {
opt = &(IPCB(skb)->opt);
iph = skb->nh.raw;
opt->optlen = ((struct iphdr *)iph)->ihl*4 -
sizeof(struct iphdr);
optptr = iph + sizeof(struct iphdr);
opt->is_data = 0;
} else {
optptr = opt->is_data ? opt->__data : (unsigned
char*)&(skb->nh.iph[1]);
iph = optptr - sizeof(struct iphdr);
}
...
I don't see how that avoids blowing up if we get passed a NULL skb.
>From the line
struct rtable *rt = skb ? (struct rtable*)skb->dst : NULL;
it is clear that we /may/ get passed a null skb.
Then a bit further down in the if (!opt) bit we dereference 'skb' :
opt = &(IPCB(skb)->opt);
and we also may dereference it in the else part :
optptr = opt->is_data ? opt->__data : (unsigned char*)&(skb->nh.iph[1]);
So if 'skb' is NULL, the only route I see that doesn't cause a NULL
pointer deref is if (opt != NULL) and at the same time
(opt->is_data != NULL) . Is that guaranteed in any way? If now,
how come we don't blow up regularly?
--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
next reply other threads:[~2006-11-16 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-16 22:34 Jesper Juhl [this message]
2006-11-16 23:47 ` David Miller
2006-11-17 0:37 ` Herbert Xu
2006-11-17 3:46 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-11-17 5:28 ` Herbert Xu
2006-11-17 0:22 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9a8748490611161434oc393db0o1e1c23ba99b1c796@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®