Re: [PATCH v1 13/14] extcon: Drop unneeded assignments

[Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@gmail.com>]

On 23. 3. 22. 23:40, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> In one case the assignment is duplicative, in the other,
> it's better to move it into the loop — the user of it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/extcon/extcon.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> index b3f038639cd6..edfa0450e605 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(extcon_dev_list_lock);
>  
>  static int check_mutually_exclusive(struct extcon_dev *edev, u32 new_state)
>  {
> -	int i = 0;
> +	int i;
>  
>  	if (!edev->mutually_exclusive)
>  		return 0;
> @@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ static int extcon_alloc_groups(struct extcon_dev *edev)
>   */
>  int extcon_dev_register(struct extcon_dev *edev)
>  {
> -	int ret, index = 0;
> +	int ret, index;
>  
>  	ret = create_extcon_class();
>  	if (ret < 0)
> @@ -1253,7 +1253,7 @@ int extcon_dev_register(struct extcon_dev *edev)
>  	if (!edev || !edev->supported_cable)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	for (; edev->supported_cable[index] != EXTCON_NONE; index++);
> +	for (index = 0; edev->supported_cable[index] != EXTCON_NONE; index++);
>  
>  	edev->max_supported = index;
>  	if (index > SUPPORTED_CABLE_MAX) {

It has the dependency with patch7. When I try to apply it, the conflict happen.
When you are sending v2 patches, I'll apply it if there are no conflict.
[1] [PATCH v1 07/14] extcon: Use unique number for the extcon device ID

Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>

-- 
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi