mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Duncan <leeman.duncan@gmail.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de,
	Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] fnic: move fnic_fnic_flush_tx() to a work queue
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:42:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c51ef07a04413fb2f2bd20f1534f96e004e4e59.1706632031.git.lduncan@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1706632031.git.lduncan@suse.com>

From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>

Rather than call 'fnic_flush_tx()' from interrupt context we should
be moving it onto a work queue to avoid any locking issues.

Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.h      | 3 ++-
 drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_fcs.c  | 3 ++-
 drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_main.c | 1 +
 drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_scsi.c | 4 ++--
 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.h b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.h
index 2074937c05bc..3b8eb7dee500 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.h
@@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ struct fnic {
 	unsigned int copy_wq_base;
 	struct work_struct link_work;
 	struct work_struct frame_work;
+	struct work_struct flush_work;
 	struct sk_buff_head frame_queue;
 	struct sk_buff_head tx_queue;
 
@@ -363,7 +364,7 @@ void fnic_handle_event(struct work_struct *work);
 int fnic_rq_cmpl_handler(struct fnic *fnic, int);
 int fnic_alloc_rq_frame(struct vnic_rq *rq);
 void fnic_free_rq_buf(struct vnic_rq *rq, struct vnic_rq_buf *buf);
-void fnic_flush_tx(struct fnic *);
+void fnic_flush_tx(struct work_struct *);
 void fnic_eth_send(struct fcoe_ctlr *, struct sk_buff *skb);
 void fnic_set_port_id(struct fc_lport *, u32, struct fc_frame *);
 void fnic_update_mac(struct fc_lport *, u8 *new);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_fcs.c b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_fcs.c
index 5e312a55cc7d..1bf1418bbde4 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_fcs.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_fcs.c
@@ -1190,8 +1190,9 @@ int fnic_send(struct fc_lport *lp, struct fc_frame *fp)
  *
  * Called without fnic_lock held.
  */
-void fnic_flush_tx(struct fnic *fnic)
+void fnic_flush_tx(struct work_struct *work)
 {
+	struct fnic *fnic = container_of(work, struct fnic, flush_work);
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	struct fc_frame *fp;
 
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_main.c b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_main.c
index 5ed1d897311a..29eead383eb9 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_main.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_main.c
@@ -830,6 +830,7 @@ static int fnic_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 		spin_lock_init(&fnic->vlans_lock);
 		INIT_WORK(&fnic->fip_frame_work, fnic_handle_fip_frame);
 		INIT_WORK(&fnic->event_work, fnic_handle_event);
+		INIT_WORK(&fnic->flush_work, fnic_flush_tx);
 		skb_queue_head_init(&fnic->fip_frame_queue);
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fnic->evlist);
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fnic->vlans);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_scsi.c
index 8d7fc5284293..fc4cee91b175 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_scsi.c
@@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ static int fnic_fcpio_fw_reset_cmpl_handler(struct fnic *fnic,
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
 
-	fnic_flush_tx(fnic);
+	queue_work(fnic_event_queue, &fnic->flush_work);
 
  reset_cmpl_handler_end:
 	fnic_clear_state_flags(fnic, FNIC_FLAGS_FWRESET);
@@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ static int fnic_fcpio_flogi_reg_cmpl_handler(struct fnic *fnic,
 		}
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
 
-		fnic_flush_tx(fnic);
+		queue_work(fnic_event_queue, &fnic->flush_work);
 		queue_work(fnic_event_queue, &fnic->frame_work);
 	} else {
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-30 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-30 16:42 [PATCH 0/2] Ensure FCoE target interrupts work Lee Duncan
2024-01-30 16:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "scsi: fcoe: Fix potential deadlock on &fip->ctlr_lock" Lee Duncan
2024-02-06  1:14   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-01-30 16:42 ` Lee Duncan [this message]
2024-01-31 11:50   ` [PATCH 2/2] fnic: move fnic_fnic_flush_tx() to a work queue kernel test robot
2024-02-06  1:23   ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9c51ef07a04413fb2f2bd20f1534f96e004e4e59.1706632031.git.lduncan@suse.com \
    --to=leeman.duncan@gmail.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=lduncan@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome