Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] iio: adc: ti-ads112c14: add DRDY interrupt support

[David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>]

On 8/10/26 3:50 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2026 at 04:19:46PM -0500, David Lechner (TI) wrote:
>> Add handling for the DRDY interrupt to wait for data ready events rather
>> than polling (only when it is wired up).
> 
> ...
> 
>> +static irqreturn_t ads112c14_drdy_irq_handler(int irq, void *private)
>> +{
>> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = private;
>> +	struct ads112c14_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> 
> I have seen some discussion about this, but what's the problem with the
> 
> 	struct ads112c14_data *data = iio_priv(private);
> 
> ?

indio_dev gets used in a later patch, so point is to avoid churn.

> 
>> +	complete(&data->drdy_completion);
>> +
>> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
> 
> ...
> 
>> +	if (device_property_present(dev, "interrupts")) {
> 
> Unfortunately this is no-go for ACPI-enabled systems.
> On ACPI we expect to have 'interrupt-names' but 'interrupts' is OF-only.

So device_property_present(dev, "interrupt-names") is OK?

> 
>> +		data->drdy_irq = fwnode_irq_get_byname(dev_fwnode(dev), "drdy");
>> +		if (data->drdy_irq < 0)
>> +			return dev_err_probe(dev, data->drdy_irq,
>> +					     "failed to get drdy interrupt\n");
>> +