mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: X15 alpha release: as fast as TUX but in user space (fwd)
Date: 29 Apr 2001 13:19:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cht0g$jcn$1@cesium.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3AEBF782.1911EDD2@mandrakesoft.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0104290914260.14261-100000@twinlark.arctic.org>

Followup to:  <Pine.LNX.4.33.0104290914260.14261-100000@twinlark.arctic.org>
By author:    dean gaudet <dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> > "H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
> > > We discussed this at the Summit, not a year or two ago.  x86-64 has
> > > it, and it wouldn't be too bad to do in i386... just noone did.
> >
> > It came up long before that.  I refer to the technique in a post dated
> > Nov 17, even though I can't find the original.
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg13584.html
> >
> > Initiated by a post from (iirc) Dean Gaudet, we found out that
> > gettimeofday was one particular system call in the Apache fast path that
> > couldn't be optimized well, or moved out of the fast path.  After a
> > couple of suggestions for improving things, Linus chimed in with the
> > magic page suggestion.
> 
> heheh.  i can't claim that i was the first ever to think of this.  but
> here's the post i originally made on the topic.  iirc a few folks said
> "security horror!"... then last year ingo and linus (and probably others)
> came up with a scheme everyone was happy with.
> 
> i was kind of solving a different problem with the code page though -- the
> ability to use rdtsc on SMP boxes with processors of varying speeds and
> synchronizations.
> 

The thing that made me say we discussed this last month was Richard's
comment that it had already been implemented (which it has, by Andrea,
for x86-64.)  The idea of doing it for i386 has been kicked around for
years, originally as a way to handle INT 0x80 vs SYSENTER vs SYSCALL,
which I think is part of why it never got implemented, since handling
multiple flavours of system calls apparently causes some pain in the
system call entry/exit path.

The handling of a few things like gettimeofday etc. was something we
observed could be added on top at that time, but was largely
considered secondary.

	-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt

  reply	other threads:[~2001-04-29 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-28 15:52 Ingo Molnar
2001-04-28 19:53 ` Andi Kleen
2001-04-28 22:56 ` Richard Gooch
2001-04-29  5:13   ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-04-29 11:14     ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-29 16:21       ` dean gaudet
2001-04-29 20:19         ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2001-04-29 21:16         ` Jim Gettys
2001-04-29 21:40           ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-04-29 21:47             ` Jim Gettys
2001-05-02 18:18           ` Matti Aarnio
2001-05-02 19:34             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-02 20:55               ` Fabio Riccardi
2001-04-29 22:29         ` Richard Gooch
2001-04-30  7:02       ` David S. Miller
2001-04-30  7:29         ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-04-30  7:51         ` David S. Miller
2001-04-30 14:56         ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-04-29 11:27     ` David S. Miller
2001-04-29 13:32       ` Ingo Oeser
2001-04-29 18:48       ` Richard Gooch
2001-04-29 18:55         ` Gregory Maxwell
2001-04-29 19:02         ` Richard Gooch
2001-04-29 19:47           ` Gregory Maxwell
2001-04-29 19:54           ` Richard Gooch
2001-04-29 20:11         ` Ingo Oeser
2001-04-29 20:18           ` Gregory Maxwell
2001-04-30  0:13             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-04-29 20:45           ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-04-29 22:20           ` Richard Gooch
2001-04-30 16:46           ` Alan Cox
2001-04-29 22:18         ` Richard Gooch
2001-04-29 19:38       ` Jamie Lokier
2001-04-29 23:53         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-04-30  8:42     ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-03  7:13       ` Kai Henningsen
2001-05-03  7:44         ` Keith Owens
2001-05-03 10:37           ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-03 15:44           ` Gregory Maxwell
2001-05-07 19:04           ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-03  9:37         ` Alan Cox
2001-05-07 19:03           ` vsyscalls [was Re: X15 alpha release: as fast as TUX but in user space (fwd)] Pavel Machek
2001-05-03 12:23       ` X15 alpha release: as fast as TUX but in user space (fwd) Helge Hafting
2001-05-03 19:09         ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-03 19:50           ` agrawal
2001-05-07 19:07             ` vsyscallRe: " Pavel Machek
2001-05-03 20:19           ` Alan Cox
2001-05-03 20:41             ` Gregory Maxwell
2001-05-04  8:06               ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-04 17:31                 ` dean gaudet
2001-05-04  8:43             ` bert hubert
2001-05-02 10:52   ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-02 10:53     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='9cht0g$jcn$1@cesium.transmeta.com' \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®