* Traffic Controller Performance in Kernel 2.4 vs 2.6
@ 2007-10-03 2:43 Sonny
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Sonny @ 2007-10-03 2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello
This is a repost, there seems to have a misunderstanding before.
I hope this is the right place to ask this. Does any know if there is a
substantial difference in the performance of the traffic controller
between kernel 2.4 and 2.6. We tested it using 1 iperf server and use
250 and 500 clients, altering the burst.
This is the set-up:
iperf client - router (w/ traffic controller) - iperf server
We use the top command inside the router to check the idle time of our
router to see this. The results we got from the 2.4 kernel shows
around 65-70% idle time while the 2.6 shows
60-65% idle time. We tried to use MRTG and we're not getting any
results either. We want to know if we could improve the bandwidth by
upgrading the kernel, else we would have to get a new bandwidth
manager. Have anyone performed a similar test or can suggest a better
way to do this. Thanks in advance.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-10-03 2:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-03 2:43 Traffic Controller Performance in Kernel 2.4 vs 2.6 Sonny
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®