From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: "Ondřej Jirman" <megi@xff.cz>, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@kernel.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/sun4i: Wait for pending reload before CTRL write
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 11:56:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e9003b7-0331-4b37-9b06-5e9de887199e@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260725113341.2250687-1-megi@xff.cz>
On 7/25/26 13:33, Ondřej Jirman wrote:
> From: Ondrej Jirman <megi@xff.cz>
>
> The A13 manual says of TMR0_RELOAD: "After the bit is set, it can not be
> written again before it's cleared automatically." Both time_stop() and
> time_start() read-modify-write the control register, so a reload still in
> flight gets rewritten and the write can be dropped, leaving the timer
> unarmed. In oneshot mode this happens on every tick, and the tick
> eventually stops for good.
>
> Wait for the reload to clear first. All control register updates go
> through sun4i_clkevt_time_stop().
>
> Without this my Allwinner A13 based Pocketbook Touch Lux 3 stops
> scheduling processes during boot or within a few seconds of executing
> userspace. Only sysrq+t over serial port works at this stage, which is
> how I discovered the root cause.
>
> Fixes: 7e14183469d8 ("clocksource: sun4i: Fix bug when switching from periodic to oneshot modes")
> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <megi@xff.cz>
> ---
> BTW, similar issue will likely be also in timer-sun5i.c but I don't have any
> device that would exercise it. And it's possible that this triggers more easily
> with CONFIG_HZ=1000 which I use.
>
> drivers/clocksource/timer-sun4i.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-sun4i.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-sun4i.c
> index 7bdcc60ad43c..2e7457f671c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-sun4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-sun4i.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@
>
> #define TIMER_SYNC_TICKS 3
>
> +/* The reload bit clears a couple of source clock cycles after it is set. */
> +#define TIMER_RELOAD_MAX_POLL 100
> +
> /*
> * When we disable a timer, we need to wait at least for 2 cycles of
> * the timer source clock. We will use for that the clocksource timer
> @@ -53,9 +56,30 @@ static void sun4i_clkevt_sync(void __iomem *base)
> cpu_relax();
> }
>
> +/*
> + * The control register must not be written while a reload is still in
> + * flight, or the write can be dropped.
> + */
> +static int sun4i_clkevt_wait_reload(void __iomem *base, u8 timer)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < TIMER_RELOAD_MAX_POLL; i++) {
> + if (!(readl(base + TIMER_CTL_REG(timer)) & TIMER_CTL_RELOAD))
> + return 0;
> + cpu_relax();
> + }
The loop looks correct but I'm wondering why not use the helper:
ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(base + TIMER_CTL_REG(timer), val,
!(val & TIMER_CTL_RELOAD), 0, timeout);
> + return -ETIME;
> +}
> +
> static void sun4i_clkevt_time_stop(void __iomem *base, u8 timer)
> {
> - u32 val = readl(base + TIMER_CTL_REG(timer));
> + u32 val;
> +
> + sun4i_clkevt_wait_reload(base, timer);
If it fails ?
> +
> + val = readl(base + TIMER_CTL_REG(timer));
> writel(val & ~TIMER_CTL_ENABLE, base + TIMER_CTL_REG(timer));
> sun4i_clkevt_sync(base);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-25 11:33 Ondřej Jirman
2026-08-12 9:56 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2026-08-12 11:09 ` Ondřej Jirman
2026-08-12 11:49 ` Daniel Lezcano
2026-08-12 19:17 ` Ondřej Jirman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e9003b7-0331-4b37-9b06-5e9de887199e@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=daniel.lezcano@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@kernel.org \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=megi@xff.cz \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®