From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com>,
Brian Vazquez <brianvv.kernel@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
Petar Penkov <ppenkov@google.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 8/9] selftests/bpf: add batch ops testing for hmap and hmap_percpu
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:36:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f80a432-9825-9a39-cc90-d1358e0fc40f@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191119193036.92831-9-brianvv@google.com>
On 11/19/19 11:30 AM, Brian Vazquez wrote:
> From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
>
> Tested bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_batch() and bpf_map_update_batch()
> functionality.
> $ ./test_maps
> ...
> test_hmap_lookup_and_delete_batch:PASS
> test_pcpu_hmap_lookup_and_delete_batch:PASS
> ...
Maybe you can add another tests for lookup_batch() and delete_batch()
so all new APIs get tested?
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com>
> ---
> .../map_lookup_and_delete_batch_htab.c | 257 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 257 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/map_lookup_and_delete_batch_htab.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/map_lookup_and_delete_batch_htab.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/map_lookup_and_delete_batch_htab.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..93e024cb85c60
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/map_lookup_and_delete_batch_htab.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2019 Facebook */
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +
> +#include <bpf/bpf.h>
> +#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
> +
> +#include <bpf_util.h>
> +#include <test_maps.h>
> +
> +static void map_batch_update(int map_fd, __u32 max_entries, int *keys,
> + void *values, bool is_pcpu)
> +{
> + typedef BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU(int, value);
> + int i, j, err;
> + value *v;
> +
> + if (is_pcpu)
> + v = (value *)values;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
> + keys[i] = i + 1;
> + if (is_pcpu)
> + for (j = 0; j < bpf_num_possible_cpus(); j++)
> + bpf_percpu(v[i], j) = i + 2 + j;
> + else
> + ((int *)values)[i] = i + 2;
> + }
> +
> + err = bpf_map_update_batch(map_fd, keys, values, &max_entries, 0, 0);
> + CHECK(err, "bpf_map_update_batch()", "error:%s\n", strerror(errno));
> +}
> +
> +static void map_batch_verify(int *visited, __u32 max_entries,
> + int *keys, void *values, bool is_pcpu)
> +{
> + typedef BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU(int, value);
> + value *v;
> + int i, j;
> +
> + if (is_pcpu)
> + v = (value *)values;
> +
> + memset(visited, 0, max_entries * sizeof(*visited));
> + for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
> +
> + if (is_pcpu) {
> + for (j = 0; j < bpf_num_possible_cpus(); j++) {
> + CHECK(keys[i] + 1 + j != bpf_percpu(v[i], j),
> + "key/value checking",
> + "error: i %d j %d key %d value %d\n",
> + i, j, keys[i], bpf_percpu(v[i], j));
> + }
> + } else {
> + CHECK(keys[i] + 1 != ((int *)values)[i],
> + "key/value checking",
> + "error: i %d key %d value %d\n", i, keys[i],
> + ((int *)values)[i]);
> + }
> +
> + visited[i] = 1;
> +
> + }
> + for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
> + CHECK(visited[i] != 1, "visited checking",
> + "error: keys array at index %d missing\n", i);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void __test_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(bool is_pcpu)
> +{
> + int map_type = is_pcpu ? BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH : BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH;
> + struct bpf_create_map_attr xattr = {
> + .name = "hash_map",
> + .map_type = map_type,
> + .key_size = sizeof(int),
> + .value_size = sizeof(int),
> + };
> + typedef BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU(int, value);
> + int map_fd, *keys, *visited, key;
> + __u32 batch = 0, count, total, total_success;
> + const __u32 max_entries = 10;
> + int err, i, step, value_size;
> + value pcpu_values[10];
> + bool nospace_err;
> + void *values;
> +
> + xattr.max_entries = max_entries;
> + map_fd = bpf_create_map_xattr(&xattr);
> + CHECK(map_fd == -1,
> + "bpf_create_map_xattr()", "error:%s\n", strerror(errno));
> +
> + value_size = is_pcpu ? sizeof(value) : sizeof(int);
> + keys = malloc(max_entries * sizeof(int));
> + if (is_pcpu)
> + values = pcpu_values;
> + else
> + values = malloc(max_entries * sizeof(int));
> + visited = malloc(max_entries * sizeof(int));
> + CHECK(!keys || !values || !visited, "malloc()",
> + "error:%s\n", strerror(errno));
> +
> + /* test 1: lookup/delete an empty hash table, -ENOENT */
> + count = max_entries;
> + err = bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(map_fd, NULL, &batch, keys,
> + values, &count, 0, 0);
> + CHECK((err && errno != ENOENT), "empty map",
> + "error: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> +
> + /* populate elements to the map */
> + map_batch_update(map_fd, max_entries, keys, values, is_pcpu);
> +
> + /* test 2: lookup/delete with count = 0, success */
> + batch = 0;
> + count = 0;
> + err = bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(map_fd, NULL, &batch, keys,
> + values, &count, 0, 0);
> + CHECK(err, "count = 0", "error: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> +
> + /* test 3: lookup/delete with count = max_entries, success */
> + memset(keys, 0, max_entries * sizeof(*keys));
> + memset(values, 0, max_entries * value_size);
> + count = max_entries;
> + batch = 0;
> + err = bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(map_fd, NULL, &batch, keys,
> + values, &count, 0, 0);
> + CHECK((err && errno != ENOENT), "count = max_entries",
> + "error: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> + CHECK(count != max_entries, "count = max_entries",
> + "count = %u, max_entries = %u\n", count, max_entries);
> + map_batch_verify(visited, max_entries, keys, values, is_pcpu);
> +
> + /* bpf_map_get_next_key() should return -ENOENT for an empty map. */
> + err = bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, &key);
> + CHECK(!err, "bpf_map_get_next_key()", "error: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> +
> + /* test 4: lookup/delete in a loop with various steps. */
> + total_success = 0;
> + for (step = 1; step < max_entries; step++) {
> + map_batch_update(map_fd, max_entries, keys, values, is_pcpu);
> + memset(keys, 0, max_entries * sizeof(*keys));
> + memset(values, 0, max_entries * value_size);
> + batch = 0;
> + total = 0;
> + i = 0;
> + /* iteratively lookup/delete elements with 'step'
> + * elements each
> + */
> + count = step;
> + nospace_err = false;
> + while (true) {
> + err = bpf_map_lookup_batch(map_fd,
> + total ? &batch : NULL,
> + &batch, keys + total,
> + values +
> + total * value_size,
> + &count, 0, 0);
> + /* It is possible that we are failing due to buffer size
> + * not big enough. In such cases, let us just exit and
> + * go with large steps. Not that a buffer size with
> + * max_entries should always work.
> + */
> + if (err && errno == ENOSPC) {
> + nospace_err = true;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> +
> + CHECK((err && errno != ENOENT), "lookup with steps",
> + "error: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> +
> + total += count;
> + if (err)
> + break;
> +
> + i++;
> + }
> + if (nospace_err == true)
> + continue;
> +
> + CHECK(total != max_entries, "lookup with steps",
> + "total = %u, max_entries = %u\n", total, max_entries);
> + map_batch_verify(visited, max_entries, keys, values, is_pcpu);
> +
> + memset(keys, 0, max_entries * sizeof(*keys));
> + memset(values, 0, max_entries * value_size);
> + batch = 0;
> + total = 0;
> + i = 0;
> + /* iteratively lookup/delete elements with 'step'
> + * elements each
> + */
> + count = step;
> + nospace_err = false;
> + while (true) {
> + err = bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(map_fd,
> + total ? &batch : NULL,
> + &batch, keys + total,
> + values +
> + total * value_size,
> + &count, 0, 0);
> + /* It is possible that we are failing due to buffer size
> + * not big enough. In such cases, let us just exit and
> + * go with large steps. Not that a buffer size with
> + * max_entries should always work.
> + */
> + if (err && errno == ENOSPC) {
> + nospace_err = true;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + CHECK((err && errno != ENOENT), "lookup with steps",
> + "error: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> +
> + total += count;
> + if (err)
> + break;
> + i++;
> + }
> +
> + if (nospace_err == true)
> + continue;
> +
> + CHECK(total != max_entries, "lookup/delete with steps",
> + "total = %u, max_entries = %u\n", total, max_entries);
> +
> + map_batch_verify(visited, max_entries, keys, values, is_pcpu);
> + err = bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, &key);
> + CHECK(!err, "bpf_map_get_next_key()", "error: %s\n",
> + strerror(errno));
> +
> + total_success++;
> + }
> +
> + CHECK(total_success == 0, "check total_success",
> + "unexpected failure\n");
> +}
> +
> +void test_hmap_lookup_and_delete_batch(void)
> +{
> + __test_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(false);
> + printf("%s:PASS\n", __func__);
> +}
> +
> +void test_pcpu_hmap_lookup_and_delete_batch(void)
> +{
> + __test_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(true);
> + printf("%s:PASS\n", __func__);
> +}
> +
> +void test_map_lookup_and_delete_batch_htab(void)
> +{
> + test_hmap_lookup_and_delete_batch();
> + test_pcpu_hmap_lookup_and_delete_batch();
> +}
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-21 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-19 19:30 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/9] add bpf batch ops to process more than 1 elem Brian Vazquez
2019-11-19 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/9] bpf: add bpf_map_{value_size,update_value,map_copy_value} functions Brian Vazquez
2019-11-22 16:36 ` John Fastabend
2019-11-19 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/9] bpf: add generic support for lookup and lookup_and_delete batch ops Brian Vazquez
2019-11-21 17:36 ` Yonghong Song
2019-11-21 21:36 ` Brian Vazquez
2019-11-22 0:34 ` Yonghong Song
2019-11-22 17:25 ` John Fastabend
2019-11-19 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/9] bpf: add generic support for update and delete " Brian Vazquez
2019-11-21 18:00 ` Yonghong Song
2019-11-22 5:50 ` Brian Vazquez
2019-11-22 6:56 ` Yonghong Song
2019-11-19 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/9] bpf: add lookup and updated batch ops to arraymap Brian Vazquez
2019-11-19 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 5/9] bpf: add batch ops to all htab bpf map Brian Vazquez
2019-11-21 18:27 ` Yonghong Song
2019-11-21 21:27 ` Brian Vazquez
2019-11-19 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 6/9] tools/bpf: sync uapi header bpf.h Brian Vazquez
2019-11-19 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 7/9] libbpf: add libbpf support to batch ops Brian Vazquez
2019-11-21 18:30 ` Yonghong Song
2019-11-19 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 8/9] selftests/bpf: add batch ops testing for hmap and hmap_percpu Brian Vazquez
2019-11-21 18:36 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2019-11-21 21:16 ` Brian Vazquez
2019-11-19 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 9/9] selftests/bpf: add batch ops testing to array bpf map Brian Vazquez
2019-11-21 18:43 ` Yonghong Song
2019-11-21 21:14 ` Brian Vazquez
2019-11-22 0:22 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9f80a432-9825-9a39-cc90-d1358e0fc40f@fb.com \
--to=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brianvv.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=brianvv@google.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ppenkov@google.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®