From: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@amd.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<tglx@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <xin@zytor.com>,
<seanjc@google.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<sohil.mehta@intel.com>, <jon.grimm@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/cpu: Disable CR pinning during CPU bringup
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 16:11:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9fa61b80-0e16-4a87-a0e7-3c3dfcda8f7e@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505a6bbd-3ecf-4de9-8fb9-0b21c3435a96@intel.com>
On 3/10/2026 12:57 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 3/9/26 11:40, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> The SNP guest is dying in __x2apic_enable() when trying to read
>> MSR_IA32_APICBASE, which will trigger a #VC.
>>
>> If I set CR4[16] in cr4_init() then the SNP guest boots fine.
>
> That sounds pretty definitive.
Thanks Dave and Tom for the help to uncover CR4.FSGSBASE implicit dependency.
> How does this work on the boot CPU? How does it manage to get FSGSBASE
> set up before __x2apic_enable()?
The boot CPU doesn't have FSGSBASE enabled before __x2apic_enable() either.
> Or is it on the early exception code, which might not use FSGSBASE instructions?
Correct. The key difference is timing relative to ALTERNATIVE patching. I added instrumentation to verify this behavior:
Boot CPU sequence (without CR pinning disable patch):
traps: trap_init() ENTRY: CR4.FSGSBASE=0, cpu=0
traps: trap_init() AFTER cpu_init: CR4.FSGSBASE=0, cpu=0
arch_cpu_finalize_init() ENTRY: CR4.FSGSBASE=0, cpu=0
identify_boot_cpu() ENTRY: CR4.FSGSBASE=0, cpu=0
identify_boot_cpu() EXIT: CR4.FSGSBASE=1, cpu=0
SMP alternatives: BEFORE apply_alternatives: CR4.FSGSBASE=1, boot_cpu_has(FSGSBASE)=1, cpu=0
SMP alternatives: Starting ALTERNATIVE patching
The boot CPU enables CR4.FSGSBASE in identify_boot_cpu() *before* ALTERNATIVE
patching occurs in alternative_instructions(). This means
cpu_init()
-> x2apic_setup()
-> __x2apic_enable()
executes unpatched paranoid_entry() code that uses RDMSR/SWAPGS instead of
RDGSBASE/WRGSBASE. Due to this, boot CPU does not have this problem.
Secondary CPU sequence (without CR pinning disable patch):
smpboot: start_secondary() BEFORE cr4_init: CR4.FSGSBASE=0, cpu=1
cr4_init() ENTRY: CR4=0x10f0, FSGSBASE=0, cpu=1
cr4_init() EXIT: CR4=0x10f0->0x3318f0, FSGSBASE=0->1, cpu=1, pinning=1
Secondary CPUs boot after alternatives have been applied globally. They
execute already-patched paranoid_entry() code that uses RDGSBASE/WRGSBASE
instructions, which require CR4.FSGSBASE=1.
Currently, secondary CPUs get CR4.FSGSBASE set implicitly through CR pinning.
The CR pinning disable patch removes this implicit setting, exposing the
hidden dependency. Without CR4.FSGSBASE enabled, RDGSBASE/WRGSBASE should
trigger #UD.
Note: I also verified the root cause by disabling the FSGSBASE ALTERNATIVE
patching, which forced the code to always use RDMSR/SWAPGS. With this change,
SNP guests boot successfully even without CR4.FSGSBASE set early, confirming
the issue is the timing between ALTERNATIVE patching (global) and CR4.FSGSBASE
enablement(per-CPU)
> Either way, I do think this needs to get fixed up. It was not acceptable
> for cr4_init() implicitly to set pinned features and then have the CPU
> boot code come along and do:
>
> cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_FSGSBASE);
>
> It all basically worked by accident before.
Agreed. The attached pre-patch makes the dependency explicit by directly
enabling CR4.FSGSBASE in cr4_init() when the feature is available. This
ensures secondary CPUs have FSGSBASE enabled before any exceptions can
occur, regardless of CR pinning state:
Secondary CPU sequence (with this patch):
smpboot: start_secondary() BEFORE cr4_init: CR4.FSGSBASE=0, cpu=1
cr4_init() ENTRY: CR4=0x10f0, FSGSBASE=0, cpu=1
cr4_init() EXIT: CR4=0x10f0->0x310f0, FSGSBASE=0->1, cpu=1, pinning=0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Enable FSGSBASE early in cr4_init()
== Background ==
Exception entry code (paranoid_entry()) uses ALTERNATIVE patching based on
X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE to decide whether to use RDGSBASE/WRGSBASE
instructions or the slower RDMSR/SWAPGS sequence for saving/restoring
GSBASE.
For boot cpu, ALTERNATIVE patching happens after enabling FSGSBASE in CR4.
When the feature is available, the code is permanently patched to use
RDGSBASE/WRGSBASE, which require CR4.FSGSBASE=1 to execute without
triggering #UD.
== Boot Sequence ==
Boot CPU (with CR pinning enabled):
trap_init()
cpu_init() <- Uses unpatched code (RDMSR/SWAPGS)
x2apic_setup()
...
arch_cpu_finalize_init()
identify_boot_cpu()
identify_cpu()
cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_FSGSBASE) # Enables the feature
# This becomes part of cr4_pinned_bits
...
alternative_instructions() <- Patches code to use RDGSBASE/WRGSBASE
Secondary CPUs (with CR pinning enabled):
start_secondary()
cr4_init() <- Code already patched, CR4.FSGSBASE=1
set implicitly via cr4_pinned_bits
cpu_init() <- exceptions work because FSGSBASE is
already enabled
Secondary CPU (with CR pinning disabled):
start_secondary()
cr4_init() <- Code already patched, CR4.FSGSBASE=0
cpu_init()
x2apic_setup()
rdmsrq(MSR_IA32_APICBASE) <- Triggers #VC in SNP guests
exc_vmm_communication()
paranoid_entry() <- Uses RDGSBASE with CR4.FSGSBASE=0
(patched code)
...
ap_starting()
identify_secondary_cpu()
identify_cpu()
cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_FSGSBASE) <- Enables the feature, which is
too late
== CR Pinning ==
Currently, CR4.FSGSBASE is set implicitly through CR pinning: the boot CPU
sets it during identify_cpu(), it becomes part of cr4_pinned_bits, and
cr4_init() applies those pinned bits to secondary CPUs. This works but
creates an undocumented dependency between cr4_init() and the pinning
mechanism.
== Problem ==
Secondary CPUs boot after alternatives have been applied globally. They
execute already-patched paranoid_entry() code that uses RDGSBASE/WRGSBASE
instructions, which require CR4.FSGSBASE=1. Upcoming changes to CR pinning
behavior will break the implicit dependency, causing secondary CPUs to
generate #UD.
This issue manifests on AMD SEV-SNP guests, where the rdmsrq() in
x2apic_setup() triggers a #VC exception early during cpu_init(). The #VC
handler (exc_vmm_communication()) executes the patched paranoid_entry()
path. Without CR4.FSGSBASE enabled, RDGSBASE instructions trigger #UD.
== Fix ==
Make the dependency explicit by directly enabling CR4.FSGSBASE in
cr4_init() when the feature is available. This ensures secondary CPUs have
FSGSBASE enabled before any exceptions can occur, matching the boot CPU's
final state.
Fixes: c82965f9e530 ("x86/entry/64: Handle FSGSBASE enabled paranoid entry/exit")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 1c3261cae40c..f5f9b242a983 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -502,6 +502,16 @@ void cr4_init(void)
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PCID))
cr4 |= X86_CR4_PCIDE;
+
+ /*
+ * Enable FSGSBASE if available. Exception entry code (paranoid_entry)
+ * is patched to use RDGSBASE/WRGSBASE when this feature is present,
+ * and those instructions require CR4.FSGSBASE=1. Secondary CPUs must
+ * enable this before any exceptions occur.
+ */
+ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE))
+ cr4 |= X86_CR4_FSGSBASE;
+
if (static_branch_likely(&cr_pinning))
cr4 = (cr4 & ~cr4_pinned_mask) | cr4_pinned_bits;
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-11 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-26 9:23 [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/fred: Fix SEV-ES/SNP guest boot failures Nikunj A Dadhania
2026-02-26 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/cpu: Disable CR pinning during CPU bringup Nikunj A Dadhania
2026-03-09 13:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-09 15:38 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-09 16:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-09 18:03 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-09 18:40 ` Tom Lendacky
2026-03-09 19:27 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-11 10:41 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania [this message]
2026-03-11 14:07 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-11 15:42 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-03-11 17:28 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-12 7:21 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-03-12 7:26 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-03-12 14:08 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-03-12 14:20 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-12 14:53 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-03-12 15:02 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-12 19:06 ` David Laight
2026-03-16 20:27 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-03-16 21:43 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-17 4:12 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-03-17 14:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-17 15:31 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-17 16:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-18 8:19 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-03-17 17:04 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-03-17 17:51 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-03-12 18:09 ` Sohil Mehta
2026-03-13 8:35 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-03-13 18:05 ` Sohil Mehta
2026-03-13 19:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-17 17:06 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-02-26 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/fred: Fix early boot failures on SEV-ES/SNP guests Nikunj A Dadhania
2026-02-26 14:14 ` Tom Lendacky
2026-02-27 4:14 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9fa61b80-0e16-4a87-a0e7-3c3dfcda8f7e@amd.com \
--to=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®