mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@amd.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<tglx@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <xin@zytor.com>,
	<seanjc@google.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<sohil.mehta@intel.com>, <jon.grimm@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/cpu: Disable CR pinning during CPU bringup
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 16:11:17 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9fa61b80-0e16-4a87-a0e7-3c3dfcda8f7e@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505a6bbd-3ecf-4de9-8fb9-0b21c3435a96@intel.com>


On 3/10/2026 12:57 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 3/9/26 11:40, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> The SNP guest is dying in __x2apic_enable() when trying to read
>> MSR_IA32_APICBASE, which will trigger a #VC.
>>
>> If I set CR4[16] in cr4_init() then the SNP guest boots fine.
> 
> That sounds pretty definitive.

Thanks Dave and Tom for the help to uncover CR4.FSGSBASE implicit dependency.

> How does this work on the boot CPU? How does it manage to get FSGSBASE
> set up before __x2apic_enable()? 

The boot CPU doesn't have FSGSBASE enabled before __x2apic_enable() either.

> Or is it on the early exception code, which might not use FSGSBASE instructions?

Correct. The key difference is timing relative to ALTERNATIVE patching. I added instrumentation to verify this behavior:

  Boot CPU sequence (without CR pinning disable patch):
     traps: trap_init() ENTRY: CR4.FSGSBASE=0, cpu=0
     traps: trap_init() AFTER cpu_init: CR4.FSGSBASE=0, cpu=0
     arch_cpu_finalize_init() ENTRY: CR4.FSGSBASE=0, cpu=0
     identify_boot_cpu() ENTRY: CR4.FSGSBASE=0, cpu=0
     identify_boot_cpu() EXIT: CR4.FSGSBASE=1, cpu=0
     SMP alternatives: BEFORE apply_alternatives: CR4.FSGSBASE=1, boot_cpu_has(FSGSBASE)=1, cpu=0
     SMP alternatives: Starting ALTERNATIVE patching

The boot CPU enables CR4.FSGSBASE in identify_boot_cpu() *before* ALTERNATIVE
patching occurs in alternative_instructions(). This means 

  cpu_init()
  -> x2apic_setup()
     -> __x2apic_enable()

executes unpatched paranoid_entry() code that uses RDMSR/SWAPGS instead of
RDGSBASE/WRGSBASE. Due to this, boot CPU does not have this problem.

  Secondary CPU sequence (without CR pinning disable patch):
     smpboot: start_secondary() BEFORE cr4_init: CR4.FSGSBASE=0, cpu=1
     cr4_init() ENTRY: CR4=0x10f0, FSGSBASE=0, cpu=1
     cr4_init() EXIT: CR4=0x10f0->0x3318f0, FSGSBASE=0->1, cpu=1, pinning=1

Secondary CPUs boot after alternatives have been applied globally. They
execute already-patched paranoid_entry() code that uses RDGSBASE/WRGSBASE
instructions, which require CR4.FSGSBASE=1.

Currently, secondary CPUs get CR4.FSGSBASE set implicitly through CR pinning.
The CR pinning disable patch removes this implicit setting, exposing the
hidden dependency. Without CR4.FSGSBASE enabled, RDGSBASE/WRGSBASE should
trigger #UD.

Note: I also verified the root cause by disabling the FSGSBASE ALTERNATIVE
patching, which forced the code to always use RDMSR/SWAPGS. With this change,
SNP guests boot successfully even without CR4.FSGSBASE set early, confirming
the issue is the timing between ALTERNATIVE patching (global) and CR4.FSGSBASE
enablement(per-CPU)
 
> Either way, I do think this needs to get fixed up. It was not acceptable
> for cr4_init() implicitly to set pinned features and then have the CPU
> boot code come along and do:
> 
> 	cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_FSGSBASE);
> 
> It all basically worked by accident before.

Agreed. The attached pre-patch makes the dependency explicit by directly
enabling CR4.FSGSBASE in cr4_init() when the feature is available. This
ensures secondary CPUs have FSGSBASE enabled before any exceptions can
occur, regardless of CR pinning state:

  Secondary CPU sequence (with this patch):
    smpboot: start_secondary() BEFORE cr4_init: CR4.FSGSBASE=0, cpu=1
    cr4_init() ENTRY: CR4=0x10f0, FSGSBASE=0, cpu=1
    cr4_init() EXIT: CR4=0x10f0->0x310f0, FSGSBASE=0->1, cpu=1, pinning=0

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Enable FSGSBASE early in cr4_init()

== Background ==

Exception entry code (paranoid_entry()) uses ALTERNATIVE patching based on
X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE to decide whether to use RDGSBASE/WRGSBASE
instructions or the slower RDMSR/SWAPGS sequence for saving/restoring
GSBASE.

For boot cpu, ALTERNATIVE patching happens after enabling FSGSBASE in CR4.
When the feature is available, the code is permanently patched to use
RDGSBASE/WRGSBASE, which require CR4.FSGSBASE=1 to execute without
triggering #UD.

== Boot Sequence ==

Boot CPU (with CR pinning enabled):
  trap_init()
    cpu_init()                   <- Uses unpatched code (RDMSR/SWAPGS)
      x2apic_setup()
  ...
  arch_cpu_finalize_init()
    identify_boot_cpu()
      identify_cpu()
        cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_FSGSBASE)  # Enables the feature
                                        # This becomes part of cr4_pinned_bits
    ...
    alternative_instructions()   <- Patches code to use RDGSBASE/WRGSBASE

Secondary CPUs (with CR pinning enabled):
  start_secondary()
    cr4_init()                   <- Code already patched, CR4.FSGSBASE=1
                                    set implicitly via cr4_pinned_bits

    cpu_init()                   <- exceptions work because FSGSBASE is
                                    already enabled

Secondary CPU (with CR pinning disabled):
  start_secondary()
    cr4_init()                   <- Code already patched, CR4.FSGSBASE=0
    cpu_init()
      x2apic_setup()
        rdmsrq(MSR_IA32_APICBASE)  <- Triggers #VC in SNP guests
          exc_vmm_communication()
            paranoid_entry()       <- Uses RDGSBASE with CR4.FSGSBASE=0
                                      (patched code)
    ...
    ap_starting()
      identify_secondary_cpu()
        identify_cpu()
	  cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_FSGSBASE)  <- Enables the feature, which is
                                             too late

== CR Pinning ==

Currently, CR4.FSGSBASE is set implicitly through CR pinning: the boot CPU
sets it during identify_cpu(), it becomes part of cr4_pinned_bits, and
cr4_init() applies those pinned bits to secondary CPUs. This works but
creates an undocumented dependency between cr4_init() and the pinning
mechanism.

== Problem ==

Secondary CPUs boot after alternatives have been applied globally. They
execute already-patched paranoid_entry() code that uses RDGSBASE/WRGSBASE
instructions, which require CR4.FSGSBASE=1. Upcoming changes to CR pinning
behavior will break the implicit dependency, causing secondary CPUs to
generate #UD.

This issue manifests on AMD SEV-SNP guests, where the rdmsrq() in
x2apic_setup() triggers a #VC exception early during cpu_init(). The #VC
handler (exc_vmm_communication()) executes the patched paranoid_entry()
path. Without CR4.FSGSBASE enabled, RDGSBASE instructions trigger #UD.

== Fix ==

Make the dependency explicit by directly enabling CR4.FSGSBASE in
cr4_init() when the feature is available. This ensures secondary CPUs have
FSGSBASE enabled before any exceptions can occur, matching the boot CPU's
final state.

Fixes: c82965f9e530 ("x86/entry/64: Handle FSGSBASE enabled paranoid entry/exit")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 1c3261cae40c..f5f9b242a983 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -502,6 +502,16 @@ void cr4_init(void)
 
 	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PCID))
 		cr4 |= X86_CR4_PCIDE;
+
+	/*
+	 * Enable FSGSBASE if available. Exception entry code (paranoid_entry)
+	 * is patched to use RDGSBASE/WRGSBASE when this feature is present,
+	 * and those instructions require CR4.FSGSBASE=1. Secondary CPUs must
+	 * enable this before any exceptions occur.
+	 */
+	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE))
+		cr4 |= X86_CR4_FSGSBASE;
+
 	if (static_branch_likely(&cr_pinning))
 		cr4 = (cr4 & ~cr4_pinned_mask) | cr4_pinned_bits;
 
-- 
2.48.1




  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-11 10:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-26  9:23 [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/fred: Fix SEV-ES/SNP guest boot failures Nikunj A Dadhania
2026-02-26  9:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/cpu: Disable CR pinning during CPU bringup Nikunj A Dadhania
2026-03-09 13:46   ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-09 15:38     ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-09 16:15       ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-09 18:03         ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-09 18:40           ` Tom Lendacky
2026-03-09 19:27             ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-11 10:41               ` Nikunj A. Dadhania [this message]
2026-03-11 14:07                 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-11 15:42                   ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-03-11 17:28                     ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-12  7:21                       ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-03-12  7:26                         ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-03-12 14:08                       ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-03-12 14:20                         ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-12 14:53                           ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-03-12 15:02                             ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-12 19:06                               ` David Laight
2026-03-16 20:27                           ` Chang S. Bae
2026-03-16 21:43                             ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-17  4:12                               ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-03-17 14:26                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-17 15:31                                 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-17 16:54                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-18  8:19                                     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-03-17 17:04                               ` Chang S. Bae
2026-03-17 17:51                                 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-03-12 18:09                         ` Sohil Mehta
2026-03-13  8:35                           ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-03-13 18:05                             ` Sohil Mehta
2026-03-13 19:10                               ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-17 17:06                             ` Chang S. Bae
2026-02-26  9:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/fred: Fix early boot failures on SEV-ES/SNP guests Nikunj A Dadhania
2026-02-26 14:14   ` Tom Lendacky
2026-02-27  4:14     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9fa61b80-0e16-4a87-a0e7-3c3dfcda8f7e@amd.com \
    --to=nikunj@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin@zytor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®