From: Sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: Adrian Bunk is now taking over the 2.6.16-stable branch
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:51:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BAYC1-PASMTP04048965AE8E3CB2A134C1AE400@CEZ.ICE> (raw)
Message-ID: <20060820185123.e84fafaf.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060820223046.GB10011@opteron.random>
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:30:46 +0200
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> wrote:
> I think it would be great to have the users choosing their preferred
> maintainer to end the era of maintainers being decided by other
> maintainers like you actually did. A simple website on kernel.org can
> achieve it, where users can registers for voting and the maintainers
> willing to maintain 2.6-stable can registers themself too. That's at
> least less random than the current status if what you said above is
> true and if 2.6.16-stable is meant to reach any critical mass.
There's no need for a vote. Users already vote for a maintainer when
they decide to use a paticular kernel tree.
No user is forced to follow a particular maintainer. And anyone can step
up and declare that they are also offering a maintained tree.
And this situation is already self correcting; if no users follow, it's
unlikely that a maintainer will continue doing the required work. And
if a maintainer doesn't do a satisfactory job, it's very unlikely many
people will choose to use that tree.
Sean
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-20 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-03 20:49 Greg KH
2006-08-04 2:43 ` Josh Boyer
2006-08-04 6:26 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-04 23:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-06 0:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2006-08-06 4:52 ` Greg KH
2006-08-20 22:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] ` <20060820185123.e84fafaf.seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
2006-08-20 22:51 ` Sean [this message]
2006-08-20 23:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2006-08-20 23:38 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-21 0:05 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-21 13:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2006-08-20 23:05 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-20 23:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2006-08-21 6:21 ` David Miller
2006-08-21 9:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2006-08-22 7:27 ` Matthias Andree
2006-08-24 13:00 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-06 6:17 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-07 12:40 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-07 16:53 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2006-08-07 17:59 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-07 23:30 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-08 19:55 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-09 21:45 Chuck Ebbert
2006-08-09 22:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-09 22:18 ` Greg KH
2006-08-09 22:45 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-09 22:53 ` Greg KH
2006-08-09 23:05 ` Chris Wright
2006-08-09 23:20 ` Rene Scharfe
2006-08-10 11:57 ` Stefan Richter
2006-08-12 16:24 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BAYC1-PASMTP04048965AE8E3CB2A134C1AE400@CEZ.ICE \
--to=seanlkml@sympatico.ca \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jwboyer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®