From: Michael-Luke Jones <mlj28@cam.ac.uk>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@gmail.com>,
Richard Purdie <richard@openedhand.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm-cc@laptop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 11:23:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C7B006D9-08C2-4F44-9DCE-9753F7DB4D3F@cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070525104253.GA4555@ucw.cz>
On 25 May 2007, at 11:42, Pavel Machek wrote:
> What is the performance difference between safe and unsafe version?
On 24 May 2007, at 23:26, Richard Purdie wrote:
> For my minilzo kernel patch, the safe version showed a 7.2%
> performance
> hit.
The conclusion seemed to be that we should drop the 'unsafe' version
on this basis.
Michael-Luke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-26 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-23 8:27 Nitin Gupta
2007-05-23 10:53 ` Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-23 11:39 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-23 13:57 ` Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-23 14:03 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-23 14:10 ` Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-23 14:21 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-23 14:33 ` Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-24 22:41 ` Richard Purdie
2007-05-24 22:54 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-24 23:00 ` Richard Purdie
2007-05-23 16:16 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-23 16:49 ` Richard Purdie
2007-05-24 4:04 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-25 10:42 ` Pavel Machek
2007-05-26 10:23 ` Michael-Luke Jones [this message]
2007-05-26 11:17 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-23 14:50 ` Bret Towe
2007-05-24 13:48 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-25 2:38 ` Bret Towe
2007-05-25 5:10 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-25 17:02 ` Bret Towe
2007-05-25 17:33 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-26 11:30 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-27 3:39 ` Bret Towe
2007-05-23 19:34 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-24 4:37 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-24 10:49 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-24 8:25 ` Richard Purdie
2007-05-24 11:07 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-24 14:29 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-24 19:12 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-24 14:20 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-24 20:09 ` Satyam Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C7B006D9-08C2-4F44-9DCE-9753F7DB4D3F@cam.ac.uk \
--to=mlj28@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm-cc@laptop.org \
--cc=nitingupta910@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=richard@openedhand.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®