From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
dev@kresin.me,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gpio: stp-xway: simplify error handling in xway_stp_probe()
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 09:39:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZqGqwRY1X_frEd0z6QeyO2KQf9vZ9UPRkLSowYLF4e-A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190702223248.31934-2-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 12:33 AM Martin Blumenstingl
<martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Return early if devm_gpiochip_add_data() returns an error instead of
> having two consecutive "if (!ret) ..." statements.
>
> Also make xway_stp_hw_init() return void because it unconditionally
> returns 0. While here also update the kerneldoc comment for
> xway_stp_hw_init().
>
> These changes makes the error handling within the driver consistent.
> No functional changes intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-04 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-02 22:32 [PATCH 0/4] gpio: stp-xway: small cleanups and improvements Martin Blumenstingl
2019-07-02 22:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] gpio: stp-xway: simplify error handling in xway_stp_probe() Martin Blumenstingl
2019-07-04 7:39 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2019-07-02 22:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] gpio: stp-xway: improve module clock error handling Martin Blumenstingl
2019-07-04 7:40 ` Linus Walleij
2019-07-02 22:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] gpio: stp-xway: get rid of the #include <lantiq_soc.h> dependency Martin Blumenstingl
2019-07-04 7:41 ` Linus Walleij
2019-07-02 22:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] gpio: stp-xway: allow compile-testing Martin Blumenstingl
2019-07-04 7:44 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACRpkdZqGqwRY1X_frEd0z6QeyO2KQf9vZ9UPRkLSowYLF4e-A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=blogic@openwrt.org \
--cc=dev@kresin.me \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®