From: "Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
To: "Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@kernel.org>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
"Dmitry Baryshkov" <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: <~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht>,
<phone-devel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: pd_mapper: Add SM7225 compatible
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 11:15:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D6GG70FQ29ZB.PEJZ4TE4HWQV@fairphone.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ee51e35-da7d-42c6-a868-bd8f8700d617@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Fri Dec 20, 2024 at 10:39 AM CET, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 20.12.2024 9:39 AM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > The Qualcomm SM7225 is practically identical to SM6350, so add an entry
> > using that data.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
> > ---
>
> I think we should instead add the fallback compatible, like
>
> - enum:
> - asdf,asdf
> - const: qcom,sm7225
> - const: qcom,sm6350
>
> as we've done for speedbin/rename variants of SoCs lately, with separate
> entries being added for "actually different" sillicon.
We also have currently for example sm7325=sc7280=qcm6490, would that
fall into this category as well for you, or are they more different?
But do you think it's worth trying to also change existing platforms
like that? We also have basically the same list in
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c where we have both sm6350 and
sm7225 right now.
Regards
Luca
>
> Konrad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-20 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-20 8:39 Luca Weiss
2024-12-20 9:39 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-12-20 10:15 ` Luca Weiss [this message]
2024-12-20 13:20 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-01-08 22:51 ` Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D6GG70FQ29ZB.PEJZ4TE4HWQV@fairphone.com \
--to=luca.weiss@fairphone.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phone-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®