From: "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Cc: "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org" <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove 'flags' arg from ldlm_flock_destroy()
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:23:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D702959F-FD04-4996-8C43-98263EC36D9D@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <150872002976.3340.17760141414233585370.stgit@noble>
On Oct 22, 2017, at 18:53, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> wrote:
>
> The only value ever passed in LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC, so assume that
> instead of passing it.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c | 36 ++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
> index d5a5742a1171..1bf56892fcf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
> @@ -88,24 +88,23 @@ ldlm_flocks_overlap(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct ldlm_lock *new)
> }
>
> static inline void
> -ldlm_flock_destroy(struct ldlm_lock *lock, enum ldlm_mode mode, __u64 flags)
> +ldlm_flock_destroy(struct ldlm_lock *lock, enum ldlm_mode mode)
> {
> - LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "%s(mode: %d, flags: 0x%llx)",
> - __func__, mode, flags);
> + LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "%s(mode: %d)",
> + __func__, mode);
>
> /* Safe to not lock here, since it should be empty anyway */
> LASSERT(hlist_unhashed(&lock->l_exp_flock_hash));
>
> list_del_init(&lock->l_res_link);
> - if (flags == LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC) {
> - /* client side - set a flag to prevent sending a CANCEL */
> - lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_LOCAL_ONLY | LDLM_FL_CBPENDING;
>
> - /* when reaching here, it is under lock_res_and_lock(). Thus,
> - * need call the nolock version of ldlm_lock_decref_internal
> - */
> - ldlm_lock_decref_internal_nolock(lock, mode);
> - }
> + /* client side - set a flag to prevent sending a CANCEL */
> + lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_LOCAL_ONLY | LDLM_FL_CBPENDING;
> +
> + /* when reaching here, it is under lock_res_and_lock(). Thus,
> + * need call the nolock version of ldlm_lock_decref_internal
> + */
> + ldlm_lock_decref_internal_nolock(lock, mode);
>
> ldlm_lock_destroy_nolock(lock);
> }
> @@ -208,8 +207,7 @@ static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req)
> }
>
> if (added) {
> - ldlm_flock_destroy(lock, mode,
> - LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC);
> + ldlm_flock_destroy(lock, mode);
> } else {
> new = lock;
> added = 1;
> @@ -233,8 +231,7 @@ static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req)
> new->l_policy_data.l_flock.end + 1;
> break;
> }
> - ldlm_flock_destroy(lock, lock->l_req_mode,
> - LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC);
> + ldlm_flock_destroy(lock, lock->l_req_mode);
> continue;
> }
> if (new->l_policy_data.l_flock.end >=
> @@ -265,8 +262,7 @@ static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req)
> NULL, 0, LVB_T_NONE);
> lock_res_and_lock(req);
> if (IS_ERR(new2)) {
> - ldlm_flock_destroy(req, lock->l_granted_mode,
> - LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC);
> + ldlm_flock_destroy(req, lock->l_granted_mode);
> return LDLM_ITER_STOP;
> }
> goto reprocess;
> @@ -323,7 +319,7 @@ static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req)
> * could be freed before the completion AST can be sent.
> */
> if (added)
> - ldlm_flock_destroy(req, mode, LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC);
> + ldlm_flock_destroy(req, mode);
>
> ldlm_resource_dump(D_INFO, res);
> return LDLM_ITER_CONTINUE;
> @@ -477,7 +473,7 @@ ldlm_flock_completion_ast(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u64 flags, void *data)
> LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "client-side enqueue deadlock received");
> rc = -EDEADLK;
> }
> - ldlm_flock_destroy(lock, mode, LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC);
> + ldlm_flock_destroy(lock, mode);
> unlock_res_and_lock(lock);
>
> /* Need to wake up the waiter if we were evicted */
> @@ -498,7 +494,7 @@ ldlm_flock_completion_ast(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u64 flags, void *data)
> * in the lock changes we can decref the appropriate refcount.
> */
> LASSERT(ldlm_is_test_lock(lock));
> - ldlm_flock_destroy(lock, getlk->fl_type, LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC);
> + ldlm_flock_destroy(lock, getlk->fl_type);
> switch (lock->l_granted_mode) {
> case LCK_PR:
> getlk->fl_type = F_RDLCK;
>
>
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-27 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-23 0:53 [PATCH 0/9] Assorted cleanups for staging/.../lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c NeilBrown
2017-10-23 0:53 ` [PATCH 2/9] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove unused 'work_list' arg from ldlm_process_flock_lock() NeilBrown
2017-10-27 9:09 ` Dilger, Andreas
2017-10-23 0:53 ` [PATCH 4/9] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove 'flags' " NeilBrown
2017-10-27 9:19 ` Dilger, Andreas
2017-10-23 0:53 ` [PATCH 1/9] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove 'first_enq' " NeilBrown
2017-10-27 9:08 ` Dilger, Andreas
2017-10-23 0:53 ` [PATCH 9/9] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove unused field 'fwd_generation' NeilBrown
2017-10-27 9:39 ` [lustre-devel] " Dilger, Andreas
2017-10-27 11:10 ` NeilBrown
2017-10-23 0:53 ` [PATCH 5/9] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove unused 'overlaps' variable NeilBrown
2017-10-27 9:20 ` Dilger, Andreas
2017-10-23 0:53 ` [PATCH 3/9] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove unneeded 'err' arg to ldlm_process_flock_lock() NeilBrown
2017-10-27 9:11 ` Dilger, Andreas
2017-10-23 0:53 ` [PATCH 7/9] staging: lustre: ldlm: tidy list walking in ldlm_flock() NeilBrown
2017-10-27 9:32 ` Dilger, Andreas
2017-10-23 0:53 ` [PATCH 8/9] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove unnecessary 'ownlocks' variable NeilBrown
2017-10-27 9:33 ` Dilger, Andreas
2017-10-23 0:53 ` [PATCH 6/9] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove 'flags' arg from ldlm_flock_destroy() NeilBrown
2017-10-27 9:23 ` Dilger, Andreas [this message]
2017-10-24 22:20 ` [PATCH 0/9] Assorted cleanups for staging/.../lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c James Simmons
2017-10-25 21:55 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D702959F-FD04-4996-8C43-98263EC36D9D@intel.com \
--to=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®