Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] bpf: cgroup: fix sysctl new-value handling in __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sysctl

["Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>]

On Fri May 29, 2026 at 7:37 AM EDT, Dawei Feng wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 12:44 PM, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
>>I think patch 1 and patch 3 should be adjacent in the series.
>>
>>Why is patch 2 placed between them?
>
> Hi Jiayuan,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> Patch 1 and Patch 2 are actually parallel to each other. They both address
> pre-existing issues that would be exposed and triggered once the changes
> in Patch 3 are applied.
>
> In a previous iteration, a test bot and another maintainer pointed out
> that activating the code path without fixing the underlying issues first
> could trigger a kernel panic.
>
> I placed both prerequisite fixes (Patch 1 and Patch 2) before Patch 3.
> This ensures that the fixes are already in place before the code path is
> activated.
>
> If you prefer a different order, please let me know and I will be happy to
> adjust it.
>
>> Change is fine but fixes tag is wrong like the bot said.
>
> Noted. I will correct the Fixes tag in v3.
>
>> I saw a reviewed-by tag given by Emil in previous thread. Pls carry it 
>> when sending new verson.
>
> Thanks for catching this. I will make sure to collect and carry Emil's
> Reviewed-by tag in the upcoming v3.
>

Seconding what Jiayuan said in terms of the Fixes: tag. Also feel free
to add my Reviewed-by: on patch 2/3 that IIRC was not present on v1.

> Best regards,
> Dawei