Re: [PATCH] serial: cpm_uart: use irq variable for platform_get_irq()

["Rosen Penev" <rosenp@gmail.com>]

On Thu Oct 1, 2026 at 1:46 AM PDT, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 11:15:30AM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
>> struct uart_port has its irq member as an unsigned int, which does not
>> work when platform_get_irq() returns an error.
>>
>> Use a local irq variable to handle this and write to struct uart_port's
>> irq member when platform_get_irq() succeeds. On success, it returns an
>> IRQ >= 0, which is representable by unsigned int.
>>
>> Fixes: 831603b3e8aa ("serial: cpm_uart: replace irq_of_parse_and_map with platform_get_irq")
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202609251916.1XlVHLwd-lkp@intel.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart.c | 10 ++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart.c
>> index 39f54bb7b485..ca0acccd3dd8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart.c
>> @@ -1517,6 +1517,7 @@ static int cpm_uart_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
>>  {
>>  	int index = probe_index++;
>>  	struct uart_cpm_port *pinfo = &cpm_uart_ports[index];
>> +	int irq;
>>  	int ret;
>>
>>  	pinfo->port.line = index;
>> @@ -1524,14 +1525,15 @@ static int cpm_uart_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
>>  	if (index >= UART_NR)
>>  		return -ENODEV;
>>
>> +	irq = platform_get_irq(ofdev, 0);
>> +	if (irq < 0)
>> +		return irq;
>> +
>>  	platform_set_drvdata(ofdev, pinfo);
>>
>>  	/* initialize the device pointer for the port */
>>  	pinfo->port.dev = &ofdev->dev;
>> -
>> -	pinfo->port.irq = platform_get_irq(ofdev, 0);
>> -	if (pinfo->port.irq < 0)
>> -		return pinfo->port.irq;
>> +	pinfo->port.irq = irq;
>
> Why did you move where platform_get_irq() is called?

So that platform_set_drvdata does not get called on failure.

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h