mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
	"Zhenghui Hao" <zhenghui.hao@qq.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <vbabka@kernel.org>, <surenb@google.com>, <mhocko@suse.com>,
	<brendan.jackman@linux.dev>, <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: release isolated freepages on compound range mismatch
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2026 09:30:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMKSPTAEU1FR.3EF4U7CIIJ39J@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd519d0f-9e00-4efe-a090-9ce81bd4ccfc@kernel.org>

On Mon Nov 2, 2026 at 5:10 AM EST, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 11/2/26 10:29, Zhenghui Hao wrote:
>> 
>> On 2026/11/2 17:11, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>>> On 11/2/26 10:06, Zhenghui Hao wrote:
>>>> alloc_contig_frozen_range_noprof() isolates [outer_start, outer_end)
>>>> before checking whether a __GFP_COMP request exactly matches the
>>>> allocated range.  If it does not, the function returns -EINVAL without
>>>> releasing cc.freepages, leaking the isolated pages.
>>>>
>>>> Call release_free_list() before returning -EINVAL, while the pageblock
>>>> is still isolated, matching the cleanup already used when
>>>> isolate_freepages_range() fails.
>>>>
>>>> Use WARN_ONCE() as well: the condition is reachable through the exported
>>>> API, and repeated invalid calls should not flood dmesg.
>>>>
>>>> Tested with an order-9 free pageblock and a one-page __GFP_COMP
>>>> subrange:
>>>>   before: free_buddy=0, leaked=512/512
>>>>   after:  free_buddy=1, leaked=0/512
>>> How did you reproduce this? Using a hacky kernel module?
>>>
>>>> Fixes: e98337d11bbdf ("mm/contig_alloc: support __GFP_COMP")
>>> I thought we discussed this in the past: if you are able to trigger the WARN
>>> something is messed up already.
>>>
>>>
>>> And indeed, same patch already here, SMH
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260629-free-pfn-on-alloc-contig-range-error-path-v1-1-496ff9ca22db@nvidia.com/
>> Thanks for the pointer, and sorry for the duplicate -- I missed the
>> earlier thread.
>> 
>> You're right on both points: the reproducer was a synthetic module, not a
>> real workload, and being able to trigger the WARN means the underlying
>> path or validation needs fixing rather than papering over it with
>> WARN_ONCE.
>> 
>> I'll drop this version and follow the existing thread. I'll check whether
>> the earlier patch is still pending and only send an update if there is a
>> real delta on the current tree.
>
> @Zi, are you still intending to follow up on the things we discussed in that thread?

Yes, I have the patch locally and will send it out today.


-- 
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi


      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-02 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-02  9:06 Zhenghui Hao
2026-11-02  9:11 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-02  9:29   ` Zhenghui Hao
2026-11-02 10:10     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-02 14:30       ` Zi Yan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DMKSPTAEU1FR.3EF4U7CIIJ39J@nvidia.com \
    --to=ziy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhenghui.hao@qq.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®