mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhenghui Hao <zhenghui.hao@qq.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: vbabka@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
	brendan.jackman@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org, ziy@nvidia.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: release isolated freepages on compound range mismatch
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 17:29:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tencent_9125D3B8701AD20B318ED534FC1119659807@qq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d79db66-2195-4f8d-a721-e1756bc6ead0@kernel.org>


On 2026/11/2 17:11, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 11/2/26 10:06, Zhenghui Hao wrote:
>> alloc_contig_frozen_range_noprof() isolates [outer_start, outer_end)
>> before checking whether a __GFP_COMP request exactly matches the
>> allocated range.  If it does not, the function returns -EINVAL without
>> releasing cc.freepages, leaking the isolated pages.
>>
>> Call release_free_list() before returning -EINVAL, while the pageblock
>> is still isolated, matching the cleanup already used when
>> isolate_freepages_range() fails.
>>
>> Use WARN_ONCE() as well: the condition is reachable through the exported
>> API, and repeated invalid calls should not flood dmesg.
>>
>> Tested with an order-9 free pageblock and a one-page __GFP_COMP
>> subrange:
>>   before: free_buddy=0, leaked=512/512
>>   after:  free_buddy=1, leaked=0/512
> How did you reproduce this? Using a hacky kernel module?
>
>> Fixes: e98337d11bbdf ("mm/contig_alloc: support __GFP_COMP")
> I thought we discussed this in the past: if you are able to trigger the WARN
> something is messed up already.
>
>
> And indeed, same patch already here, SMH
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260629-free-pfn-on-alloc-contig-range-error-path-v1-1-496ff9ca22db@nvidia.com/
Thanks for the pointer, and sorry for the duplicate -- I missed the
earlier thread.

You're right on both points: the reproducer was a synthetic module, not a
real workload, and being able to trigger the WARN means the underlying
path or validation needs fixing rather than papering over it with
WARN_ONCE.

I'll drop this version and follow the existing thread. I'll check whether
the earlier patch is still pending and only send an update if there is a
real delta on the current tree.

Thanks,
Zhenghui


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-02  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-02  9:06 Zhenghui Hao
2026-11-02  9:11 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-02  9:29   ` Zhenghui Hao [this message]
2026-11-02 10:10     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-02 14:30       ` Zi Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tencent_9125D3B8701AD20B318ED534FC1119659807@qq.com \
    --to=zhenghui.hao@qq.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®