From: "Nicolás Antinori" <nico.antinori.7@gmail.com>
To: "Miguel Ojeda" <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun@kernel.org>,
"Brendan Higgins" <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"David Gow" <david@davidgow.net>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>,
"Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Burak Emir" <burak.emir@gmail.com>,
"Rae Moar" <raemoar63@gmail.com>,
"Tamir Duberstein" <tamird@kernel.org>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"Yury Norov" <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] rust: bitmap: kunit: uncomment owned_bitmap_out_of_bounds panic case
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 10:50:49 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMRKVJYRSG2B.2LT5AVK5FQ52G@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72ma7GrbeMjktpWzNwWYj5y+AsQk8NROKY6TMdk3fwXEgA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun Nov 8, 2026 at 4:59 PM -03, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 5:59 PM Nicolás Antinori via B4 Relay
> <devnull+nico.antinori.7.gmail.com@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> - #[test]
>> #[cfg(not(CONFIG_RUST_BITMAP_HARDENED))]
>> + #[test]
>
> Is this one done to match the other? If so, please mention it in the
> commit message, and consider whether the last test in the file should
> also be changed then.
Yes! it was to match the other one. Since there are more tests the other
way (#[test] on top) I can change the one I am uncommenting! (kunit.rs
have also the #[test] attributes on top where a #[cfg(..)] is present).
>
> (We could do it in a separate, previous commit, but that is nit :)
>
>> let mut b = BitmapVec::new(128, GFP_KERNEL)?;
>> -
>> b.set_bit(2048);
>
> Spurious change?
It was on purpose, I thought it looked tidier separating it (but it is
just personal taste :P, gonna revert this in the v3)
>
>> + #[should_panic]
>
> It is great to have this, thanks! :)
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 16:59 [PATCH v2 0/3] rust: kunit: support #[should_panic] and same test name with different #[cfg(...)] Nicolás Antinori via B4 Relay
2026-10-29 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] rust: kunit: add #[should_panic] support Nicolás Antinori via B4 Relay
2026-11-02 14:58 ` Nicolás Antinori
2026-11-02 15:51 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-11-02 20:53 ` Nicolás Antinori
2026-11-02 21:25 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-11-03 15:05 ` David Gow
2026-11-03 15:00 ` David Gow
2026-11-03 14:46 ` David Gow
2026-11-03 16:32 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-11-06 5:31 ` David Gow
2026-11-04 17:58 ` Nicolás Antinori
2026-11-06 5:31 ` David Gow
2026-11-10 13:39 ` Nicolás Antinori
2026-10-29 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] rust: kunit: allow same test name with different #[cfg(...)] Nicolás Antinori via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 14:45 ` David Gow
2026-11-09 14:10 ` Gary Guo
2026-10-29 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] rust: bitmap: kunit: uncomment owned_bitmap_out_of_bounds panic case Nicolás Antinori via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 14:46 ` David Gow
2026-11-08 19:14 ` Burak Emir
2026-11-08 19:59 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-11-10 13:50 ` Nicolás Antinori [this message]
2026-11-10 14:01 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-11-10 14:19 ` Nicolás Antinori
2026-11-03 14:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] rust: kunit: support #[should_panic] and same test name with different #[cfg(...)] David Gow
2026-11-05 13:46 ` Nicolás Antinori
2026-11-06 5:31 ` David Gow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DMRKVJYRSG2B.2LT5AVK5FQ52G@gmail.com \
--to=nico.antinori.7@gmail.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
--cc=burak.emir@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=david@davidgow.net \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=raemoar63@gmail.com \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tamird@kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®