mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nicolás Antinori" <nico.antinori.7@gmail.com>
To: "Miguel Ojeda" <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun@kernel.org>,
	"Brendan Higgins" <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"David Gow" <david@davidgow.net>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
	"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	"Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>,
	"Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
	"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
	"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
	"Burak Emir" <burak.emir@gmail.com>,
	"Rae Moar" <raemoar63@gmail.com>,
	"Tamir Duberstein" <tamird@kernel.org>,
	"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
	"Yury Norov" <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] rust: bitmap: kunit: uncomment owned_bitmap_out_of_bounds panic case
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 10:50:49 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMRKVJYRSG2B.2LT5AVK5FQ52G@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72ma7GrbeMjktpWzNwWYj5y+AsQk8NROKY6TMdk3fwXEgA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun Nov 8, 2026 at 4:59 PM -03, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 5:59 PM Nicolás Antinori via B4 Relay
> <devnull+nico.antinori.7.gmail.com@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> -    #[test]
>>      #[cfg(not(CONFIG_RUST_BITMAP_HARDENED))]
>> +    #[test]
>
> Is this one done to match the other? If so, please mention it in the
> commit message, and consider whether the last test in the file should
> also be changed then.

Yes! it was to match the other one. Since there are more tests the other
way (#[test] on top) I can change the one I am uncommenting! (kunit.rs
have also the #[test] attributes on top where a #[cfg(..)] is present).

>
> (We could do it in a separate, previous commit, but that is nit :)
>
>>          let mut b = BitmapVec::new(128, GFP_KERNEL)?;
>> -
>>          b.set_bit(2048);
>
> Spurious change?

It was on purpose, I thought it looked tidier separating it (but it is
just personal taste :P, gonna revert this in the v3)

>
>> +    #[should_panic]
>
> It is great to have this, thanks! :)
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-29 16:59 [PATCH v2 0/3] rust: kunit: support #[should_panic] and same test name with different #[cfg(...)] Nicolás Antinori via B4 Relay
2026-10-29 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] rust: kunit: add #[should_panic] support Nicolás Antinori via B4 Relay
2026-11-02 14:58   ` Nicolás Antinori
2026-11-02 15:51     ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-11-02 20:53       ` Nicolás Antinori
2026-11-02 21:25         ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-11-03 15:05           ` David Gow
2026-11-03 15:00     ` David Gow
2026-11-03 14:46   ` David Gow
2026-11-03 16:32     ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-11-06  5:31       ` David Gow
2026-11-04 17:58     ` Nicolás Antinori
2026-11-06  5:31       ` David Gow
2026-11-10 13:39         ` Nicolás Antinori
2026-10-29 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] rust: kunit: allow same test name with different #[cfg(...)] Nicolás Antinori via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 14:45   ` David Gow
2026-11-09 14:10   ` Gary Guo
2026-10-29 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] rust: bitmap: kunit: uncomment owned_bitmap_out_of_bounds panic case Nicolás Antinori via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 14:46   ` David Gow
2026-11-08 19:14   ` Burak Emir
2026-11-08 19:59   ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-11-10 13:50     ` Nicolás Antinori [this message]
2026-11-10 14:01       ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-11-10 14:19         ` Nicolás Antinori
2026-11-03 14:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] rust: kunit: support #[should_panic] and same test name with different #[cfg(...)] David Gow
2026-11-05 13:46   ` Nicolás Antinori
2026-11-06  5:31     ` David Gow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DMRKVJYRSG2B.2LT5AVK5FQ52G@gmail.com \
    --to=nico.antinori.7@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
    --cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=burak.emir@gmail.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
    --cc=david@davidgow.net \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=raemoar63@gmail.com \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tamird@kernel.org \
    --cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
    --cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®