mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Matlack" <dmatlack@google.com>
To: "Tarun Sahu" <tarunsahu@google.com>,
	"Pasha Tatashin" <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	<maz@kernel.org>, <will@kernel.org>,
	"David Matlack" <dmatlack@google.com>,
	"Alexander Graf" <graf@amazon.com>, <seanjc@google.com>,
	<jgg@nvidia.com>, <loganodell@google.com>, <arnd@arndb.de>,
	<dwmw2@infradead.org>, <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>, <oupton@kernel.org>,
	<alex@shazbot.org>, <gle.com@google.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	<kevin.tian@intel.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	<kexec@lists.infradead.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<skhawaja@google.com>, <sagis@google.com>,
	<linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 16/19] PCI: liveupdate: Add feature header to struct pci_dev_ser
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 16:23:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMRO4QXXB8H4.127C1CPT3RZ18@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110050202.529473-17-tarunsahu@google.com>

On Tue Nov 10, 2026 at 5:01 AM UTC, Tarun Sahu wrote:
> Precede each serialized PCI device entry in the PCI Live Update KHO block
> set with struct kho_ser_hdr via DECLARE_KHO_SER so future per-device PCI
> Live Update features can append fields to struct pci_dev_ser without
> breaking compatibility between adjacent kernels.

Elements of a collection should not have their own feature headers. This
applies to patches 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18. I raised this during the v2
discussion [1][2], but I don't think it was addressed.

All entries in a KHO block set are written by the same kernel using the
same struct, and the block set has a single entry_size, so every entry
header is necessarily identical. They don't convey anything that the
header of the struct that owns the collection can't. In this case,
struct pci_ser's header can define features that describe fields in
struct pci_dev_ser, and the PCI core checks them once before iterating.
If a feature only applies to some devices, the field's value in each
entry says whether that device uses it.

Per-entry headers also cost a lot for small entries. struct pci_dev_ser
goes from 8 to 16 bytes, and to 24 bytes once the first feature is
added. Patch 18 does the same for every preserved memfd folio, which for
a large guest backed by 4K pages adds gigabytes of preserved metadata.

They also add new ways to read out of bounds. kho_ser_payload() trusts
nr_required/nr_optional in each entry, and nothing checks that the entry
header plus payload fit within entry_size. In patches 14 and 18 the walk
uses each entry's fhdr->size to find the next entry, so one bad header
throws off every entry after it.

Instead I would keep struct pci_dev_ser as a plain struct, take the
entry size from the KHO block header (patch 2), and in pci_flb_retrieve()
check once that the entry size covers the base fields, plus the fields
of any features set in struct pci_ser's header, e.g.:

	entry_size = kho_block_set_entry_size(&incoming->block_set);
	if (entry_size < offsetofend(struct pci_dev_ser, refcount))
		panic(...);

That also restores the minimum entry size check that the v10 PCI series
had with PCI_DEV_SER_MIN_SIZE, which this version drops.

[...]

> -	kho_block_set_init(&incoming->block_set, sizeof(struct pci_dev_ser));
> +	kho_block_set_init(&incoming->block_set, kho_ser_size(pci_dev_ser));

This size is never used. kho_block_set_restore() overwrites it with the
entry size recorded by the previous kernel. Passing this kernel's size
here is misleading: pci_flb_retrieve() (and the LUO session/file restore
paths) read as if they iterate incoming entries with the outgoing entry
size, which would be a bug.

Incoming block sets should not take an entry size at all.
kho_block_set_restore() should initialize the block set itself from the
incoming block headers, and the incoming paths should drop the
kho_block_set_init() call.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/kexec/atl6K2Juy6Bh29lh@google.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/kexec/at-8vkVpN2SF3XgB@google.com/


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-10  5:01 [PATCH v4 00/19] kho, liveupdate: Add feature header for fine-grained ABI compatibility Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 01/19] liveupdate, kho: Remove __packed from KHO, LUO and memfd ABI structures Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 12:56   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 02/19] kho: block: Record the entry size in the block header Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 13:10   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 03/19] kho, memfd_luo: Reference struct kho_vmalloc via serialized pointer Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 14:23   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 04/19] liveupdate: Reference struct luo_file_set_ser " Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 14:47   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 05/19] kho: Add feature header for fine-grained ABI compatibility Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 14:47   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-10 15:12   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 06/19] kho: kexec_metadata: Add the feature header Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 15:08   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 07/19] kho: vmalloc: " Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 08/19] kho: block: Add the feature header to blocks Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 09/19] liveupdate: Add feature header to struct luo_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 10/19] liveupdate: Add feature header to struct luo_session_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 11/19] liveupdate: Add feature header to struct luo_file_set_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 12/19] liveupdate: Add feature header to struct luo_file_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 13/19] liveupdate: Add feature header to struct luo_flb_header_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 14/19] liveupdate: Add feature header to struct luo_flb_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 15/19] PCI: liveupdate: Add feature header to struct pci_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:01 ` [PATCH v4 16/19] PCI: liveupdate: Add feature header to struct pci_dev_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 16:23   ` David Matlack [this message]
2026-11-10  5:02 ` [PATCH v4 17/19] mm: memfd_luo: Add feature header to struct memfd_luo_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:02 ` [PATCH v4 18/19] mm: memfd_luo: Add feature header to struct memfd_luo_folio_ser Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10  5:02 ` [PATCH v4 19/19] kho: Add KUnit test for the feature header helpers Tarun Sahu
2026-11-10 12:48 ` [PATCH v4 00/19] kho, liveupdate: Add feature header for fine-grained ABI compatibility Pasha Tatashin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DMRO4QXXB8H4.127C1CPT3RZ18@google.com \
    --to=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gle.com@google.com \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loganodell@google.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sagis@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    --cc=tarunsahu@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®