Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

[Dag Wieers]

Hey,

I noticed a single unresolved symbol in wavelan_cs.o and I fixed it as
described below.

(For those in favor of .lost+found/, raise your hand ;))

--- drivers/net/pcmcia/wavelan_cs.c.orig        Sat Feb 10 18:19:13 2001
+++ drivers/net/pcmcia/wavelan_cs.c     Sat Feb 10 18:18:01 2001
@@ -4821,5 +4821,7 @@
 #endif
 }

+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bad_udelay);
+
 module_init(init_wavelan_cs);
 module_exit(exit_wavelan_cs);

--  dag wieers, <dag@mind.be>, http://mind.be/  --
            Out of swap, out of luck.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

[Alan Cox]

> I noticed a single unresolved symbol in wavelan_cs.o and I fixed it as
> described below.

Rejected. It is meant not to be there.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

[Rik van Riel]

On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

> > I noticed a single unresolved symbol in wavelan_cs.o and I fixed it as
> > described below.
> 
> Rejected. It is meant not to be there.

To be more specific ... __bad_udelay() is meant to be an
unresolvable symbol, which is referenced when people call
udelay with a "wrong" timeout.

regards,

Rik
--
Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml

Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

		http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/	http://distro.conectiva.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

[Dag Wieers]

On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:

>> Rejected. It is meant not to be there.
>
> To be more specific ... __bad_udelay() is meant to be an
> unresolvable symbol, which is referenced when people call
> udelay with a "wrong" timeout.

Maybe this (and similar situations) could be added to the lkml-FAQ ?
It would have prevented me to post it on lkml ;)

Thanks,

--  dag wieers, <dag@mind.be>, http://mind.be/  --
            Out of swap, out of luck.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/