From: "Christian Bornträger" <linux-kernel@borntraeger.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: 2.4.15-pre9 breakage (inode.c)
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 11:20:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E167ZvV-0000Cq-00@mrvdom01.schlund.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111232154320.1821-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111232154320.1821-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
Hi everyone,
We have seen on the 2.4.14-loop problem that a lot of people don't read the
LKML or the archives.
But there is still the broken 2.4.15 on kernel.org.
Now I am asking myself wouldn't it be better to mark 2.4.15 as broken and
replace it as soon as Alexander and Andrea have decided which of the patches
is better?
greetings
Christian Bornträger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-24 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-23 21:22 Alexander Viro
2001-11-23 21:42 ` Jeff Merkey
2001-11-23 21:51 ` [PATCH][CFT] " Alexander Viro
2001-11-23 22:06 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-23 22:34 ` Russell King
2001-11-23 22:35 ` Phil Sorber
2001-11-23 22:49 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-23 23:05 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-23 23:35 ` Russell King
2001-11-24 1:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-11-24 5:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-24 5:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-11-24 6:08 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-24 6:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-24 6:31 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-24 6:37 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-24 6:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-24 6:58 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-24 7:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-24 7:06 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-24 7:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-24 7:30 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-24 7:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-24 8:05 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-24 8:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-24 8:38 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-24 9:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-24 9:56 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-24 10:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-24 6:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-24 6:51 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-24 9:00 ` Russell King
2001-11-24 10:20 ` Christian Bornträger [this message]
2001-11-24 6:04 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-24 6:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-24 6:29 ` Alexander Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E167ZvV-0000Cq-00@mrvdom01.schlund.de \
--to=linux-kernel@borntraeger.net \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®