Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: Note describing poor dcache utilization under high memory pressure

[Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>]

On January 28, 2002 08:25 pm, Hans Reiser wrote:
> If I understand you right, your scheme has the fundamental flaw that one 
> dcache entry on a page can keep an entire page full of "slackers" in 
> memory, and since there is little correlation in usage between dcache 
> entries that happen to get stored on a page, the result is that the 
> effectiveness per megabyte of the dcache is decreased by an order of 
> magnitude.  It would be worse to have one dcache entry per page, but 
> maybe not by as much as you might expect.
> 
> When objects smaller than a page are stored on a page but not correlated 
> in their usage, they need to be aged individually not as a page, and 
> then garbage collected as needed.

I had the identical thought - i.e., that this is a job for object aging and 
not lru, then I realized that a slight modification to lru can do the job, 
that is:

  - An access to any object on the page promotes the page to the hot end
    of the lru list.

  - When it's time to recover a page (or pages) scan from the cold end
    towards the hot end, and recover the first page(s) on which all
    objects are free.

> Neither the current model nor your 
> proposed scheme solve the fundamental problem Josh's measurements prove 
> exists.  

My suggestion might.

-- 
Daniel