* Re: HZ impact
@ 2002-10-16 15:22 Samium Gromoff
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Samium Gromoff @ 2002-10-16 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
> Mornin' All,
> Quick question, what is the impact good/bad of changing the HZ value
> from 100 to 1000 in the asm-i386/param.h? Besides the fact that it is 10
> times larger.
potentially lesser latencies vs.
more cache trashing
---
cheers,
Samium Gromoff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* HZ impact
@ 2002-10-16 15:03 Reed, Timothy A
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Reed, Timothy A @ 2002-10-16 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel ML (E-mail), Reed, Timothy A; +Cc: Lindke, Chad
Mornin' All,
Quick question, what is the impact good/bad of changing the HZ value
from 100 to 1000 in the asm-i386/param.h? Besides the fact that it is 10
times larger.
TIA
Timothy Reed
Software Engineer \ Systems Administrator
Lockheed Martin - NE & SS Syracuse
Email: timothy.a.reed@lmco.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-16 15:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-16 15:22 HZ impact Samium Gromoff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-16 15:03 Reed, Timothy A
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®