[patch 3/5] pcmcia/ds: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep()

[patch 3/5] pcmcia/ds: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep()

[janitor]

I would appreciate any comments from the janitor@sternweltens list. This is one (of
many) cases where I made a decision about replacing

set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule_timeout(some_time);

with

msleep(jiffies_to_msecs(some_time));

msleep() is not exactly the same as the previous code, but I only did
this replacement where I thought long delays were *desired*. If this is
not the case here, then just disregard this patch. 

Thanks,
Nish



Description: Uses msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee
the task delays the desired time.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Attems <janitor@sternwelten.at>

---

 linux-2.6.9-rc2-bk7-max/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/pcmcia/ds.c~msleep-drivers_pcmcia_ds drivers/pcmcia/ds.c
--- linux-2.6.9-rc2-bk7/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c~msleep-drivers_pcmcia_ds	2004-09-21 20:51:16.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.9-rc2-bk7-max/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c	2004-09-21 20:51:16.000000000 +0200
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
 #include <linux/poll.h>
 #include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
 
 #include <asm/atomic.h>
@@ -1080,8 +1081,7 @@ static int __devinit pcmcia_bus_add_sock
 	 * Ugly. But we want to wait for the socket threads to have started up.
 	 * We really should let the drivers themselves drive some of this..
 	 */
-	current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-	schedule_timeout(HZ/4);
+	msleep(250);
 
 	init_waitqueue_head(&s->queue);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&s->request);
_