[patch 26/26] char/zftape-buffers: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep_interruptible()

[patch 26/26] char/zftape-buffers: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep_interruptible()

[janitor]

Any comments would be appreciated. There actually won't be a PATCH
33/33, because I dropped one that even I wouldn't approve :)

Description: Use msleep_interruptible() instead of schedule_timeout() to
guarantee the task delays as expected.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>

---

 linux-2.6.9-rc2-bk7-max/drivers/char/ftape/zftape/zftape-buffers.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/char/ftape/zftape/zftape-buffers.c~msleep_interruptible-drivers_char_zftape-buffers drivers/char/ftape/zftape/zftape-buffers.c
--- linux-2.6.9-rc2-bk7/drivers/char/ftape/zftape/zftape-buffers.c~msleep_interruptible-drivers_char_zftape-buffers	2004-09-21 22:54:49.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.9-rc2-bk7-max/drivers/char/ftape/zftape/zftape-buffers.c	2004-09-21 22:55:52.000000000 +0200
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 
 #include <linux/zftape.h>
 
@@ -119,8 +120,7 @@ void *zft_kmalloc(size_t size)
 	void *new;
 
 	while ((new = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL) {
-		current->state   = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-		schedule_timeout(HZ/10);
+		msleep_interruptible(100);
 	}
 	memset(new, 0, size);
 	used_memory += size;
_