mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] fix handling of st_nlink on procfs root
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 20:31:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1F6vyO-00009r-3a@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)

Date: 1139427460 -0500

1) it should use nr_processes(), not nr_threads; otherwise we are getting
very confused find(1) and friends, among other things.
2) better do that at stat() time than at every damn lookup in procfs root.

Patch had been sitting in FC4 kernels for many months now...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

---

 fs/proc/inode.c |    4 ----
 fs/proc/root.c  |   17 +++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

ec5a7567ad58f55067f527e700723480cfbdbee5
diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c
index 6573f31..075d3e9 100644
--- a/fs/proc/inode.c
+++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
@@ -204,10 +204,6 @@ int proc_fill_super(struct super_block *
 	root_inode = proc_get_inode(s, PROC_ROOT_INO, &proc_root);
 	if (!root_inode)
 		goto out_no_root;
-	/*
-	 * Fixup the root inode's nlink value
-	 */
-	root_inode->i_nlink += nr_processes();
 	root_inode->i_uid = 0;
 	root_inode->i_gid = 0;
 	s->s_root = d_alloc_root(root_inode);
diff --git a/fs/proc/root.c b/fs/proc/root.c
index 6889628..c3fd361 100644
--- a/fs/proc/root.c
+++ b/fs/proc/root.c
@@ -80,16 +80,16 @@ void __init proc_root_init(void)
 	proc_bus = proc_mkdir("bus", NULL);
 }
 
-static struct dentry *proc_root_lookup(struct inode * dir, struct dentry * dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
+static int proc_root_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry, struct kstat *stat
+)
 {
-	/*
-	 * nr_threads is actually protected by the tasklist_lock;
-	 * however, it's conventional to do reads, especially for
-	 * reporting, without any locking whatsoever.
-	 */
-	if (dir->i_ino == PROC_ROOT_INO) /* check for safety... */
-		dir->i_nlink = proc_root.nlink + nr_threads;
+	generic_fillattr(dentry->d_inode, stat);
+	stat->nlink = proc_root.nlink + nr_processes();
+	return 0;
+}
 
+static struct dentry *proc_root_lookup(struct inode * dir, struct dentry * dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
+{
 	if (!proc_lookup(dir, dentry, nd)) {
 		return NULL;
 	}
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ static struct file_operations proc_root_
  */
 static struct inode_operations proc_root_inode_operations = {
 	.lookup		= proc_root_lookup,
+	.getattr	= proc_root_getattr,
 };
 
 /*
-- 
0.99.9.GIT


             reply	other threads:[~2006-02-08 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-08 20:31 Al Viro [this message]
2006-02-09  1:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-09  2:17   ` Al Viro
2006-02-09  3:14     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-15  9:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-15 10:39   ` Al Viro
2006-02-15 17:35     ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1F6vyO-00009r-3a@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®