From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds for our constraints" to the regulator tree
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:43:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1aij3u-0004Dm-Pn@debutante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458587912-32665-2-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org>
The patch
regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds for our constraints
has been applied to the regulator tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
>From bae4fdc88d7f7dda1bfb3dd282978c617dbf16e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:12:52 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds for our
constraints
Currently we only attempt to set the voltage during constraints
application if an exact voltage is specified. Extend this so that if
the currently set voltage for the regulator is outside the bounds set in
constraints we will move the voltage to the nearest constraint, raising
to the minimum or lowering to the maximum as needed. This ensures that
drivers can probe without the hardware being driven out of spec.
Reported-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index e0b764284773..881c37e61f75 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -906,7 +906,8 @@ static int machine_constraints_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
/* do we need to apply the constraint voltage */
if (rdev->constraints->apply_uV &&
- rdev->constraints->min_uV == rdev->constraints->max_uV) {
+ rdev->constraints->min_uV && rdev->constraints->max_uV) {
+ int target_min, target_max;
int current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(rdev);
if (current_uV < 0) {
rdev_err(rdev,
@@ -914,15 +915,32 @@ static int machine_constraints_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
current_uV);
return current_uV;
}
- if (current_uV < rdev->constraints->min_uV ||
- current_uV > rdev->constraints->max_uV) {
+
+ /*
+ * If we're below the minimum voltage move up to the
+ * minimum voltage, if we're above the maximum voltage
+ * then move down to the maximum.
+ */
+ target_min = current_uV;
+ target_max = current_uV;
+
+ if (current_uV < rdev->constraints->min_uV) {
+ target_min = rdev->constraints->min_uV;
+ target_max = rdev->constraints->min_uV;
+ }
+
+ if (current_uV > rdev->constraints->max_uV) {
+ target_min = rdev->constraints->max_uV;
+ target_max = rdev->constraints->max_uV;
+ }
+
+ if (target_min != current_uV || target_max != current_uV) {
ret = _regulator_do_set_voltage(
- rdev, rdev->constraints->min_uV,
- rdev->constraints->max_uV);
+ rdev, target_min, target_max);
if (ret < 0) {
rdev_err(rdev,
- "failed to apply %duV constraint(%d)\n",
- rdev->constraints->min_uV, ret);
+ "failed to apply %d-%duV constraint(%d)\n",
+ target_min, target_max, ret);
return ret;
}
}
--
2.7.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-23 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-21 19:18 [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Always flag voltage constraints as appliable Mark Brown
2016-03-21 19:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds for our constraints Mark Brown
2016-03-21 21:06 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2016-03-24 6:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-03-24 7:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-03-26 23:50 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-03-27 9:08 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-28 16:16 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-03-29 12:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-29 14:58 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-29 18:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-29 18:27 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-30 9:07 ` Haibo Chen
2016-03-30 15:25 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-23 13:43 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2016-03-23 13:43 ` Applied "regulator: core: Always flag voltage constraints as appliable" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1aij3u-0004Dm-Pn@debutante \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®