mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>
To: "'jamesclv@us.ibm.com'" <jamesclv@us.ibm.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] 2.5.31 Summit NUMA patch with dynamic IRQ balancing
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:05:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <EDC461A30AC4D511ADE10002A5072CAD0236DDD5@orsmsx119.jf.intel.com> (raw)

> From: James Cleverdon [mailto:jamesclv@us.ibm.com] 
> > What happens when you use the FULL ACPI support? I suspect 
> that you really
> > do want the interpreter, in order to evaluate _PRTs properly.

> Bingo!  With full ACPI turned on, the system does indeed 
> boot.  The extra I/O 
> APIC entries are being programmed from the PRT.
> 
> (Call chain is:  pci_acpi_init --> acpi_pci_irq_init --> 
> mp_parse_prt --> 
> io_apic_set_pci_routing)
> 
> So, given that quite a number of our customers would like to run with 
> hyperthreading turned on, but do not want full ACPI, what is 
> the right thing 
> to do in the HT-only case?  Add extra code to process the 
> PRT?  Fall back on 
> MPS's IRQ records?  Something else entirely?

The solution is ACPI. Full ACPI. What is the problem? I have devoted too
much time already to make  hybrid ACPI/MPS combos work, but that will never
be the right solution.

Please have your customers email me privately and tell me why ~100KB of mem
on a 1GB+ system is something us engineers should spend our valuable time
hacking around, when the correct solution already is implemented and
*works*.

Regards -- Andy

             reply	other threads:[~2002-08-26  7:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-26  7:05 Grover, Andrew [this message]
2002-08-27  4:13 ` [PATCH] ACPI tweak for " James Cleverdon
2002-08-29 22:10   ` [PATCH] 2.5.31 Summit NUMA patch with dynamic IRQ balancing -- now with ACPI James Cleverdon
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-24  0:29 [PATCH] 2.5.31 Summit NUMA patch with dynamic IRQ balancing Grover, Andrew
2002-08-26  1:59 ` James Cleverdon
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0208131421190.3110-100000@penguin.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <200208131729.50127.habanero@us.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]   ` <20020813233007.GV14394@dualathlon.random.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]     ` <200208221931.35052.jamesclv@us.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-08-23  7:11       ` Andi Kleen
2002-08-23  8:48         ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-08-23 14:12         ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-23 21:36         ` James Cleverdon
2002-08-13 21:24 [PATCH] NUMA-Q disable irqbalance Linus Torvalds
2002-08-13 22:29 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-08-13 23:30   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-08-23  2:31     ` [PATCH] 2.5.31 Summit NUMA patch with dynamic IRQ balancing James Cleverdon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=EDC461A30AC4D511ADE10002A5072CAD0236DDD5@orsmsx119.jf.intel.com \
    --to=andrew.grover@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=jamesclv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®