From: "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>
To: "'jamesclv@us.ibm.com'" <jamesclv@us.ibm.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] 2.5.31 Summit NUMA patch with dynamic IRQ balancing
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:05:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EDC461A30AC4D511ADE10002A5072CAD0236DDD5@orsmsx119.jf.intel.com> (raw)
> From: James Cleverdon [mailto:jamesclv@us.ibm.com]
> > What happens when you use the FULL ACPI support? I suspect
> that you really
> > do want the interpreter, in order to evaluate _PRTs properly.
> Bingo! With full ACPI turned on, the system does indeed
> boot. The extra I/O
> APIC entries are being programmed from the PRT.
>
> (Call chain is: pci_acpi_init --> acpi_pci_irq_init -->
> mp_parse_prt -->
> io_apic_set_pci_routing)
>
> So, given that quite a number of our customers would like to run with
> hyperthreading turned on, but do not want full ACPI, what is
> the right thing
> to do in the HT-only case? Add extra code to process the
> PRT? Fall back on
> MPS's IRQ records? Something else entirely?
The solution is ACPI. Full ACPI. What is the problem? I have devoted too
much time already to make hybrid ACPI/MPS combos work, but that will never
be the right solution.
Please have your customers email me privately and tell me why ~100KB of mem
on a 1GB+ system is something us engineers should spend our valuable time
hacking around, when the correct solution already is implemented and
*works*.
Regards -- Andy
next reply other threads:[~2002-08-26 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-26 7:05 Grover, Andrew [this message]
2002-08-27 4:13 ` [PATCH] ACPI tweak for " James Cleverdon
2002-08-29 22:10 ` [PATCH] 2.5.31 Summit NUMA patch with dynamic IRQ balancing -- now with ACPI James Cleverdon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-24 0:29 [PATCH] 2.5.31 Summit NUMA patch with dynamic IRQ balancing Grover, Andrew
2002-08-26 1:59 ` James Cleverdon
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0208131421190.3110-100000@penguin.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <200208131729.50127.habanero@us.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20020813233007.GV14394@dualathlon.random.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <200208221931.35052.jamesclv@us.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-08-23 7:11 ` Andi Kleen
2002-08-23 8:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-08-23 14:12 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-23 21:36 ` James Cleverdon
2002-08-13 21:24 [PATCH] NUMA-Q disable irqbalance Linus Torvalds
2002-08-13 22:29 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-08-13 23:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-08-23 2:31 ` [PATCH] 2.5.31 Summit NUMA patch with dynamic IRQ balancing James Cleverdon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=EDC461A30AC4D511ADE10002A5072CAD0236DDD5@orsmsx119.jf.intel.com \
--to=andrew.grover@intel.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=jamesclv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®