* RE: ACPI Status
@ 2002-09-13 17:22 Grover, Andrew
2002-09-13 21:08 ` [ACPI] " Matthew Wilcox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Grover, Andrew @ 2002-09-13 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Marc Giger', linux-kernel; +Cc: acpi-devel
> From: Marc Giger [mailto:gigerstyle@gmx.ch]
> What is the current status of acpi in 2.4 / 2.5 kernels???
>
> The most things on http://acpi.sourceforge.net/ are outdated:-((
> To acpi developers: Is it possible to make a Changelog like
> Linus, Alan and Marcello and Co does??
> And it would be nice, if there were a document which
> describes the current development status..(what is already
> implemented and what not)
Oops, web content a little stale...
Try checking out the sf.net acpi project page - sf.net/projects/acpi. You
can d/l releases there and each release has a changelog.
As to development status:
Everything is code complete (more or less) EXCEPT:
- S3/S4 support
- userspace library
- using ACPI for device PnP and resource determination
If you're interested with following ACPI progress, I'd recommend subscribing
to the acpi-devel mailing list.
Regards -- Andy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [ACPI] RE: ACPI Status
2002-09-13 17:22 ACPI Status Grover, Andrew
@ 2002-09-13 21:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2002-09-13 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grover, Andrew; +Cc: 'Marc Giger', linux-kernel, acpi-devel
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 10:22:21AM -0700, Grover, Andrew wrote:
> Oops, web content a little stale...
hehe. and, more importantly, there's no link from
http://acpi.sourceforge.net/devel/ to sf.net/projects/acpi.
> As to development status:
>
> Everything is code complete (more or less) EXCEPT:
One thing I'm not clear about is status of support for ACPI 2.0.
The FAQ on intel's website claims support for ACPI 1.0b only with 2.0
"in development", but it seems rather out of date.
--
Revolutions do not require corporate support.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* ACPI Status
@ 2002-09-13 16:55 Marc Giger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marc Giger @ 2002-09-13 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi!
What is the current status of acpi in 2.4 / 2.5 kernels???
The most things on http://acpi.sourceforge.net/ are outdated:-((
To acpi developers: Is it possible to make a Changelog like Linus, Alan and Marcello and Co does??
And it would be nice, if there were a document which describes the current development status..(what is already implemented and what not)
My vaio (GR-114EK) has a lot of problems without acpi...
What i would know is:
standby supported?
acpi irq routing / sharing supported?
and other cool things that we can do with acpi supported?
Thanks
greets
marc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* ACPI Status
@ 2002-05-10 14:30 Dave Vehrs
2002-05-10 14:57 ` John Jasen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Vehrs @ 2002-05-10 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello,
Quick question, does anyone know where I can find out more about the status
of ACPI development in the kernel? Is there a seperate mailing list?
Thanks,
Dave Vehrs
Aspen Systems
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-09-13 21:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-09-13 17:22 ACPI Status Grover, Andrew
2002-09-13 21:08 ` [ACPI] " Matthew Wilcox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-13 16:55 Marc Giger
2002-05-10 14:30 Dave Vehrs
2002-05-10 14:57 ` John Jasen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®