mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Ding Hui <dinghui@sangfor.com.cn>
Cc: "jlayton@kernel.org" <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	"trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com"
	<trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
	"anna@kernel.org" <anna@kernel.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] SUNRPC: Fix UAF in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready()
Date: Sun, 7 May 2023 15:26:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <EED05302-8BC6-4593-B798-BFC476FA190E@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230507091131.23540-1-dinghui@sangfor.com.cn>



> On May 7, 2023, at 5:11 AM, Ding Hui <dinghui@sangfor.com.cn> wrote:
> 
> After the listener svc_sock freed, and before invoking svc_tcp_accept()
> for the established child sock, there is a window that the newsock
> retaining a freed listener svc_sock in sk_user_data which cloning from
> parent. In the race windows if data is received on the newsock, we will
> observe use-after-free report in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready().

My thought is that not calling sk_odata() for the newsock
could potentially result in missing a data_ready event,
resulting in a hung client on that socket.

IMO the preferred approach is to ensure that svsk is always
safe to dereference in tcp_listen_data_ready. I haven't yet
thought carefully about how to do that.


> Reproduce by two tasks:
> 
> 1. while :; do rpc.nfsd 0 ; rpc.nfsd; done
> 2. while :; do echo "" | ncat -4 127.0.0.1 2049 ; done
> 
> KASAN report:
> 
>  ==================================================================
>  BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready+0x1cf/0x1f0 [sunrpc]
>  Read of size 8 at addr ffff888139d96228 by task nc/102553
>  CPU: 7 PID: 102553 Comm: nc Not tainted 6.3.0+ #18
>  Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 11/12/2020
>  Call Trace:
>   <IRQ>
>   dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x50
>   print_address_description.constprop.0+0x27/0x310
>   print_report+0x3e/0x70
>   kasan_report+0xae/0xe0
>   svc_tcp_listen_data_ready+0x1cf/0x1f0 [sunrpc]
>   tcp_data_queue+0x9f4/0x20e0
>   tcp_rcv_established+0x666/0x1f60
>   tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x51c/0x850
>   tcp_v4_rcv+0x23fc/0x2e80
>   ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x62/0x300
>   ip_local_deliver_finish+0x267/0x350
>   ip_local_deliver+0x18b/0x2d0
>   ip_rcv+0x2fb/0x370
>   __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x166/0x1b0
>   process_backlog+0x24c/0x5e0
>   __napi_poll+0xa2/0x500
>   net_rx_action+0x854/0xc90
>   __do_softirq+0x1bb/0x5de
>   do_softirq+0xcb/0x100
>   </IRQ>
>   <TASK>
>   ...
>   </TASK>
> 
>  Allocated by task 102371:
>   kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40
>   kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
>   __kasan_kmalloc+0x7b/0x90
>   svc_setup_socket+0x52/0x4f0 [sunrpc]
>   svc_addsock+0x20d/0x400 [sunrpc]
>   __write_ports_addfd+0x209/0x390 [nfsd]
>   write_ports+0x239/0x2c0 [nfsd]
>   nfsctl_transaction_write+0xac/0x110 [nfsd]
>   vfs_write+0x1c3/0xae0
>   ksys_write+0xed/0x1c0
>   do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
> 
>  Freed by task 102551:
>   kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40
>   kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
>   kasan_save_free_info+0x2a/0x50
>   __kasan_slab_free+0x106/0x190
>   __kmem_cache_free+0x133/0x270
>   svc_xprt_free+0x1e2/0x350 [sunrpc]
>   svc_xprt_destroy_all+0x25a/0x440 [sunrpc]
>   nfsd_put+0x125/0x240 [nfsd]
>   nfsd_svc+0x2cb/0x3c0 [nfsd]
>   write_threads+0x1ac/0x2a0 [nfsd]
>   nfsctl_transaction_write+0xac/0x110 [nfsd]
>   vfs_write+0x1c3/0xae0
>   ksys_write+0xed/0x1c0
>   do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
> 
> In this RFC patch, I try to fix the UAF by skipping dereferencing
> svsk for all child socket in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready(), it is
> easy to backport for stable.
> 
> However I'm not sure if there are other potential risks in the race
> window, so I thought another fix which depends on SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY
> introduced in commit f1ff5ce2cd5e ("net, sk_msg: Clear sk_user_data
> pointer on clone if tagged").
> 
> Saving svsk into sk_user_data with SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY tag in
> svc_setup_socket() like this:
> 
>  __rcu_assign_sk_user_data_with_flags(inet, svsk, SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY);
> 
> Obtaining svsk in callbacks like this:
> 
>  struct svc_sock *svsk = rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sk);
> 
> This will avoid copying sk_user_data for sunrpc svc_sock in
> sk_clone_lock(), so the sk_user_data of child sock before accepted
> will be NULL.
> 
> Appreciate any comment and suggestion, thanks.
> 
> Fixes: fa9251afc33c ("SUNRPC: Call the default socket callbacks instead of open coding")
> Signed-off-by: Ding Hui <dinghui@sangfor.com.cn>
> ---
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> index a51c9b989d58..9aca6e1e78e4 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> @@ -825,12 +825,6 @@ static void svc_tcp_listen_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
> 
> trace_sk_data_ready(sk);
> 
> - if (svsk) {
> - /* Refer to svc_setup_socket() for details. */
> - rmb();
> - svsk->sk_odata(sk);
> - }
> -
> /*
> * This callback may called twice when a new connection
> * is established as a child socket inherits everything
> @@ -839,13 +833,18 @@ static void svc_tcp_listen_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
> *    when one of child sockets become ESTABLISHED.
> * 2) data_ready method of the child socket may be called
> *    when it receives data before the socket is accepted.
> - * In case of 2, we should ignore it silently.
> + * In case of 2, we should ignore it silently and DO NOT
> + * dereference svsk.
> */
> - if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
> - if (svsk) {
> - set_bit(XPT_CONN, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
> - svc_xprt_enqueue(&svsk->sk_xprt);
> - }
> + if (sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN)
> + return;
> +
> + if (svsk) {
> + /* Refer to svc_setup_socket() for details. */
> + rmb();
> + svsk->sk_odata(sk);
> + set_bit(XPT_CONN, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
> + svc_xprt_enqueue(&svsk->sk_xprt);
> }
> }
> 
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

--
Chuck Lever



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Ding Hui <dinghui@sangfor.com.cn>
Cc: "jlayton@kernel.org" <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	"trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com"
	<trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
	"anna@kernel.org" <anna@kernel.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] SUNRPC: Fix UAF in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready()
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 03:58:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <EED05302-8BC6-4593-B798-BFC476FA190E@oracle.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20230508035809.iThY4bPM-zhW41xoXi_RCNWRE3ZUiUI-Vw-T-GCvx6Q@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230507091131.23540-1-dinghui@sangfor.com.cn>



> On May 7, 2023, at 5:11 AM, Ding Hui <dinghui@sangfor.com.cn> wrote:
> 
> After the listener svc_sock freed, and before invoking svc_tcp_accept()
> for the established child sock, there is a window that the newsock
> retaining a freed listener svc_sock in sk_user_data which cloning from
> parent. In the race windows if data is received on the newsock, we will
> observe use-after-free report in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready().

My thought is that not calling sk_odata() for the newsock
could potentially result in missing a data_ready event,
resulting in a hung client on that socket.

IMO the preferred approach is to ensure that svsk is always
safe to dereference in tcp_listen_data_ready. I haven't yet
thought carefully about how to do that.


> Reproduce by two tasks:
> 
> 1. while :; do rpc.nfsd 0 ; rpc.nfsd; done
> 2. while :; do echo "" | ncat -4 127.0.0.1 2049 ; done
> 
> KASAN report:
> 
>  ==================================================================
>  BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready+0x1cf/0x1f0 [sunrpc]
>  Read of size 8 at addr ffff888139d96228 by task nc/102553
>  CPU: 7 PID: 102553 Comm: nc Not tainted 6.3.0+ #18
>  Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 11/12/2020
>  Call Trace:
>   <IRQ>
>   dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x50
>   print_address_description.constprop.0+0x27/0x310
>   print_report+0x3e/0x70
>   kasan_report+0xae/0xe0
>   svc_tcp_listen_data_ready+0x1cf/0x1f0 [sunrpc]
>   tcp_data_queue+0x9f4/0x20e0
>   tcp_rcv_established+0x666/0x1f60
>   tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x51c/0x850
>   tcp_v4_rcv+0x23fc/0x2e80
>   ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x62/0x300
>   ip_local_deliver_finish+0x267/0x350
>   ip_local_deliver+0x18b/0x2d0
>   ip_rcv+0x2fb/0x370
>   __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x166/0x1b0
>   process_backlog+0x24c/0x5e0
>   __napi_poll+0xa2/0x500
>   net_rx_action+0x854/0xc90
>   __do_softirq+0x1bb/0x5de
>   do_softirq+0xcb/0x100
>   </IRQ>
>   <TASK>
>   ...
>   </TASK>
> 
>  Allocated by task 102371:
>   kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40
>   kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
>   __kasan_kmalloc+0x7b/0x90
>   svc_setup_socket+0x52/0x4f0 [sunrpc]
>   svc_addsock+0x20d/0x400 [sunrpc]
>   __write_ports_addfd+0x209/0x390 [nfsd]
>   write_ports+0x239/0x2c0 [nfsd]
>   nfsctl_transaction_write+0xac/0x110 [nfsd]
>   vfs_write+0x1c3/0xae0
>   ksys_write+0xed/0x1c0
>   do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
> 
>  Freed by task 102551:
>   kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40
>   kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
>   kasan_save_free_info+0x2a/0x50
>   __kasan_slab_free+0x106/0x190
>   __kmem_cache_free+0x133/0x270
>   svc_xprt_free+0x1e2/0x350 [sunrpc]
>   svc_xprt_destroy_all+0x25a/0x440 [sunrpc]
>   nfsd_put+0x125/0x240 [nfsd]
>   nfsd_svc+0x2cb/0x3c0 [nfsd]
>   write_threads+0x1ac/0x2a0 [nfsd]
>   nfsctl_transaction_write+0xac/0x110 [nfsd]
>   vfs_write+0x1c3/0xae0
>   ksys_write+0xed/0x1c0
>   do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
> 
> In this RFC patch, I try to fix the UAF by skipping dereferencing
> svsk for all child socket in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready(), it is
> easy to backport for stable.
> 
> However I'm not sure if there are other potential risks in the race
> window, so I thought another fix which depends on SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY
> introduced in commit f1ff5ce2cd5e ("net, sk_msg: Clear sk_user_data
> pointer on clone if tagged").
> 
> Saving svsk into sk_user_data with SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY tag in
> svc_setup_socket() like this:
> 
>  __rcu_assign_sk_user_data_with_flags(inet, svsk, SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY);
> 
> Obtaining svsk in callbacks like this:
> 
>  struct svc_sock *svsk = rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sk);
> 
> This will avoid copying sk_user_data for sunrpc svc_sock in
> sk_clone_lock(), so the sk_user_data of child sock before accepted
> will be NULL.
> 
> Appreciate any comment and suggestion, thanks.
> 
> Fixes: fa9251afc33c ("SUNRPC: Call the default socket callbacks instead of open coding")
> Signed-off-by: Ding Hui <dinghui@sangfor.com.cn>
> ---
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> index a51c9b989d58..9aca6e1e78e4 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> @@ -825,12 +825,6 @@ static void svc_tcp_listen_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
> 
> trace_sk_data_ready(sk);
> 
> - if (svsk) {
> - /* Refer to svc_setup_socket() for details. */
> - rmb();
> - svsk->sk_odata(sk);
> - }
> -
> /*
> * This callback may called twice when a new connection
> * is established as a child socket inherits everything
> @@ -839,13 +833,18 @@ static void svc_tcp_listen_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
> *    when one of child sockets become ESTABLISHED.
> * 2) data_ready method of the child socket may be called
> *    when it receives data before the socket is accepted.
> - * In case of 2, we should ignore it silently.
> + * In case of 2, we should ignore it silently and DO NOT
> + * dereference svsk.
> */
> - if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
> - if (svsk) {
> - set_bit(XPT_CONN, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
> - svc_xprt_enqueue(&svsk->sk_xprt);
> - }
> + if (sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN)
> + return;
> +
> + if (svsk) {
> + /* Refer to svc_setup_socket() for details. */
> + rmb();
> + svsk->sk_odata(sk);
> + set_bit(XPT_CONN, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
> + svc_xprt_enqueue(&svsk->sk_xprt);
> }
> }
> 
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

--
Chuck Lever



  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-07 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-07  9:11 Ding Hui
2023-05-07 15:26 ` Chuck Lever III [this message]
2023-05-08  1:32   ` Ding Hui
2023-05-08  4:00     ` Chuck Lever III
2023-05-08  6:28       ` Ding Hui
2023-05-14 18:29     ` Chuck Lever III
2023-05-15  1:17       ` Ding Hui
2023-05-08  3:58   ` Chuck Lever III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=EED05302-8BC6-4593-B798-BFC476FA190E@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=bfields@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dinghui@sangfor.com.cn \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®