From: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com>
To: "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:41:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKAEEOLEAA.davids@webmaster.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40635DD9.8090809@pobox.com>
> Well IANAL, but it seems not so cut-n-dried, at least.
>
> Firmware is a program that executes on another processor, so no linking
> is taking place at all.
What does linking have to do with anything? Where not asking whether this
file *must* be shipped under the GPL. We're asking, given that is has been
placed under the GPL, what does the GPL require.
As for "another processor", another from what processor? There is just this
one file. We have here a file that is allegedly distributed under the terms
of the GPL. It is, however, obfuscated and not the preferred form for making
modifications.
DS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-26 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1B6Izr-0002Ai-00@r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de>
[not found] ` <20040325082949.GA3376@gondor.apana.org.au>
2004-03-25 22:08 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-03-25 22:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-25 22:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-03-25 22:53 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-26 0:33 ` John Hasler
2004-03-26 0:17 ` David Woodhouse
2004-03-26 1:30 ` John Hasler
2004-03-26 8:50 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-26 9:43 ` Dumitru Ciobarcianu
2004-03-26 10:14 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-26 0:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-03-26 1:07 ` GOTO Masanori
2004-03-26 1:39 ` John Hasler
2004-03-26 2:06 ` David Schwartz
2004-03-26 2:59 ` Chris Cheney
2004-03-26 3:23 ` John Hasler
2004-03-26 8:53 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-26 9:12 ` John Bradford
2004-03-26 13:59 ` John Hasler
2004-03-27 9:19 ` John Bradford
2004-03-26 0:41 ` David Schwartz [this message]
2004-03-26 11:20 ` Giuliano Pochini
2004-03-26 11:55 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-25 22:54 ` Chris Cheney
2004-03-26 0:41 ` David Schwartz
2004-03-26 9:09 ` John Bradford
2004-03-26 13:16 ` Eduard Bloch
2004-03-26 14:19 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-26 14:29 ` Eduard Bloch
2004-03-26 14:38 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-26 14:55 ` Eduard Bloch
2004-03-26 15:03 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-26 15:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-03-26 15:22 ` Guy
2004-03-26 15:53 ` Gabor Gombas
2004-03-26 21:57 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-03-30 11:39 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-30 14:02 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-30 18:11 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2004-04-02 20:53 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 15:04 Matt Reuther
2004-03-26 15:20 ` Matthew Garrett
2004-03-26 22:10 ` David Schwartz
[not found] <8RnZwD.A.91B.qHYaAB@murphy>
2004-03-30 14:57 ` Humberto Massa
2004-03-30 16:51 ` Henning Makholm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKAEEOLEAA.davids@webmaster.com \
--to=davids@webmaster.com \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®