From: Eddy Tao <taoyuan_eddy@hotmail.com>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
dev@openvswitch.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: openvswitch: ovs_packet_cmd_execute put sw_flow mainbody in stack
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:11:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OS3P286MB22953C8741F17F500879FA86F5A49@OS3P286MB2295.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y/IqJvWEJ+UNOs6i@corigine.com>
Hi, Simon:
About your concern for the stack size, it leads to more room for
improvement.
I will file a new version which will have smaller stack occupation and
better performance
The new revision is invoked by existing examples of using struct in
stack, in the same file net/openvswitch/datapath.c
struct sw_flow_actions *get_flow_actions(..)
{
struct sw_flow_key masked_key;==> sizeof sw_flow_key is 464 bytes
static noinline_for_stack int
ovs_nla_init_match_and_action(..)
{
struct sw_flow_mask mask;==> sizeof sw_flow_mask is 496 bytes
The first example reminded me, revisiting the code in
ovs_packet_cmd_execute, basically sw_flow serves as a container for
sw_flow_actions and sw_flow_key only.
We do not need the bulk of tunnel info memory in sw_flow, which saves us
200+ bytes further -- less is more.
The new revision will be presented shortly after some sanity and benchmark
eddy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-20 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-18 6:53 Eddy Tao
2023-02-19 13:54 ` Simon Horman
2023-02-19 14:46 ` Eddy Tao
2023-02-19 14:51 ` Eddy Tao
2023-02-20 3:04 ` Eddy Tao
2023-02-20 3:44 ` [ovs-dev] " Eddy Tao
2023-02-20 7:11 ` Eddy Tao [this message]
2023-02-20 10:37 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OS3P286MB22953C8741F17F500879FA86F5A49@OS3P286MB2295.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
--to=taoyuan_eddy@hotmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
--cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®