* Re: my broken TCP is faster on broken networks
@ 1998-09-12 0:39 jamal
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: jamal @ 1998-09-12 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Theodore Y. Ts'o (tytso@MIT.EDU) Fri, 11 Sep 1998 18:36:43 -0400
>I don't normally follow the TCP implementor's working group (*), so I
>don't know if they actually followed through on his suggestion;
>Matthais's note seems to indicate that they did.
I think it is just considered good practise to punish misbehaving users
at the moment. Not sure if any vendor has implemented anything yet.
There is an informational RFC out:
http://info.internet.isi.edu:80/in-notes/rfc/files/rfc2309.txt
Unfortunately, they dont mention remedies for misbehaving flows. They do
suggest RED; however, there are variants of RED that exist with specific
intention of punishing misbehaving users.
A really interesting pointer page is at:
http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/floyd/tcp_unfriendly.html
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~1998-09-11 22:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1998-09-12 0:39 my broken TCP is faster on broken networks jamal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®