Re: Please

[Andre Hedrick <andre@linuxdiskcert.org>]

I am sorry, that was done a long time agin and even updated a few times to
no acceptance.

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hedrick/2.4.{16,17,18}

Sorry it is not clear.

Regards,

On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:

> On Sunday, 3. March 2002 01:25, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, john slee wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 04:43:58PM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> > > > The problem is called Andre Hedrick, a guy who is talking in miracles,
> > > > but seems to be unable to fix either the issues with:
> > > >  - the single TX4 with multiple PDC20270
> > > > nor:
> > > >  - multiple TX2 with PDC20268
> > > >
> > > > or at least ignores further communication on that problems, if you
> > > > don't use some magic storage peoples language.(*) TM in a parallel
> > > > universe, not too far from here...
> > >
> > > so you're going to fix the problems yourself then?
> > >
> > > j.
> >
> > You mean this does not work for you?  Serious question, not being flip.
> >
> > Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31
> > ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
> > AMD7441: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39
> > AMD7441: chipset revision 3
> > AMD7441: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
> > AMD7441: disabling single-word DMA support (revision < C4)
> >     ide0: BM-DMA at 0xd000-0xd007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
> >     ide1: BM-DMA at 0xd008-0xd00f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio
> > PDC20270: IDE controller on PCI bus 03 dev 08
> > PDC20270: chipset revision 2
> > PDC20270: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
> >     ide2: BM-DMA at 0x9000-0x9007, BIOS settings: hde:pio, hdf:pio
> >     ide3: BM-DMA at 0x9008-0x900f, BIOS settings: hdg:pio, hdh:pio
> > PDC20270: IDE controller on PCI bus 03 dev 10
> > PDC20270: chipset revision 2
> > PDC20270: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
> > PDC20270: ROM enabled at 0x000dc000
> >     ide4: BM-DMA at 0xa400-0xa407, BIOS settings: hdi:pio, hdj:pio
> >     ide5: BM-DMA at 0xa408-0xa40f, BIOS settings: hdk:pio, hdl:pio
> > hda: IBM-DTLA-307075, ATA DISK drive
> > hdc: LTN242, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
> > hde: Maxtor 4G160J8, ATA DISK drive
> > hdg: Maxtor 4G160J8, ATA DISK drive
> > hdi: Maxtor 4G160J8, ATA DISK drive
> > hdk: Maxtor 4G160J8, ATA DISK drive
> > ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
> > ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
> > ide2 at 0x8000-0x8007,0x8402 on irq 11
> > ide3 at 0x8800-0x8807,0x8c02 on irq 11
> > ide4 at 0x9400-0x9407,0x9802 on irq 11
> > ide5 at 0x9c00-0x9c07,0xa002 on irq 11
> > hda: 150136560 sectors (76870 MB) w/1916KiB Cache, CHS=9345/255/63,
> > UDMA(100) hde: 320173056 sectors (163929 MB) w/2048KiB Cache,
> > CHS=19929/255/63, UDMA(100) hdg: 320173056 sectors (163929 MB) w/2048KiB
> > Cache, CHS=19929/255/63, UDMA(100) hdi: 320173056 sectors (163929 MB)
> > w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=19929/255/63, UDMA(100) hdk: 320173056 sectors (163929
> > MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=19929/255/63, UDMA(100) Partition check:
> >  /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 p2 p3 < p5 p6 p7 p8 p9 p10 >
> >  /dev/ide/host2/bus0/target0/lun0: p1
> >  /dev/ide/host2/bus1/target0/lun0: p1
> >  /dev/ide/host4/bus0/target0/lun0: p1
> >  /dev/ide/host4/bus1/target0/lun0: p1
> > Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
> > FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077
> >
> >
> >
> > Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31
> > ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
> > AMD7441: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39
> > AMD7441: chipset revision 3
> > AMD7441: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
> > AMD7441: disabling single-word DMA support (revision < C4)
> >     ide0: BM-DMA at 0xb000-0xb007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
> >     ide1: BM-DMA at 0xb008-0xb00f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio
> > PDC20269: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 40
> > PDC20269: chipset revision 2
> > PDC20269: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
> >     ide2: BM-DMA at 0xd400-0xd407, BIOS settings: hde:pio, hdf:pio
> >     ide3: BM-DMA at 0xd408-0xd40f, BIOS settings: hdg:pio, hdh:pio
> > PDC20269: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 48
> > PDC20269: chipset revision 2
> > PDC20269: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
> >     ide4: BM-DMA at 0xe800-0xe807, BIOS settings: hdi:pio, hdj:pio
> >     ide5: BM-DMA at 0xe808-0xe80f, BIOS settings: hdk:pio, hdl:pio
> > hda: IBM-DTLA-307075, ATA DISK drive
> > hdc: LTN242, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
> > hde: Maxtor 4G160J8, ATA DISK drive
> > hdg: Maxtor 4G160J8, ATA DISK drive
> > hdi: Maxtor 4G160J8, ATA DISK drive
> > hdk: Maxtor 4G160J8, ATA DISK drive
> > ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
> > ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
> > ide2 at 0xc400-0xc407,0xc802 on irq 10
> > ide3 at 0xcc00-0xcc07,0xd002 on irq 10
> > ide4 at 0xd800-0xd807,0xdc02 on irq 11
> > ide5 at 0xe000-0xe007,0xe402 on irq 11
> > hda: 150136560 sectors (76870 MB) w/1916KiB Cache, CHS=9345/255/63,
> > UDMA(100) hde: 320173056 sectors (163929 MB) w/2048KiB Cache,
> > CHS=19929/255/63, UDMA(133) hdg: 320173056 sectors (163929 MB) w/2048KiB
> > Cache, CHS=19929/255/63, UDMA(133) hdi: 320173056 sectors (163929 MB)
> > w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=19929/255/63, UDMA(133) hdk: 320173056 sectors (163929
> > MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=19929/255/63, UDMA(133) Partition check:
> >  /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 p2 p3 < p5 p6 p7 p8 p9 p10 >
> >  /dev/ide/host2/bus0/target0/lun0: p1
> >  /dev/ide/host2/bus1/target0/lun0: p1
> >  /dev/ide/host4/bus0/target0/lun0: p1
> >  /dev/ide/host4/bus1/target0/lun0: p1
> > Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
> > FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077
> >
> 
> Looks promising, indeed. Will try it again, soon...
> 
> In general, I fear, that the whole ATA technology commits suiside because 
> of it's own inherent complexity and historical development.
> 
> > Clearly they work, the obvious point that is missed is the work is not
> > being accepted.  Oh and I am human, too, regardless what most think or
> > hate about me.
> 
> And I understand your point. But light appears on the horizon.
> Your work is being accepted for 2.5 and 2.4-ac now, and there is 
> hope, that sometimes in the near future a generally accepted, and 
> (nearly) flawless version of 2.4 will be released. 
> 
> For now, diff/patch seems to remain everyone's favorite tools ;)
> 
> > Regards,
> >
> > Andre Hedrick
> > Linux Disk Certification Project                Linux ATA Development
> 
> Cheers,
>   Hans-Peter
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

Andre Hedrick
Linux Disk Certification Project                Linux ATA Development