From: Mark Hemment <markhe@veritas.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] nfsd + scalability
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 20:17:27 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102182007310.11260-200000@alloc> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 682 bytes --]
Hi Neil, all,
The nfs daemons run holding the global kernel lock. They still hold
this lock over calls to file_op's read and write.
The file system kernel interface (FSKI) doesn't require the kernel lock
to be held over these read/write calls. The nfs daemons do not require
that the reads or writes do not block (would be v silly if they did), so
they have no guarantee the lock isn't dropped and retaken during
blocking. ie. they aren't using it as a guard across the calls.
Dropping the kernel lock around read and write in fs/nfsd/vfs.c is a
_big_ SMP scalability win!
Attached patch is against 2.4.1-ac18, but should apply to most recent
kernel versions.
Mark
[-- Attachment #2: nfsd.patch --]
[-- Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2247 bytes --]
--- vanilla-2.4.1-ac18/fs/nfsd/vfs.c Sun Feb 18 15:06:27 2001
+++ markhe-2.4.1-ac18/fs/nfsd/vfs.c Sun Feb 18 19:32:18 2001
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#include <linux/net.h>
#include <linux/unistd.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
#include <linux/in.h>
#define __NO_VERSION__
#include <linux/module.h>
@@ -602,12 +603,28 @@
file.f_ralen = ra->p_ralen;
file.f_rawin = ra->p_rawin;
}
+
+ /*
+ * The nfs daemons run holding the global kernel lock, but
+ * f_op->read() doesn't need the lock to be held.
+ * Drop it here to help scalability.
+ *
+ * The "kernel_locked()" test isn't perfect (someone else could be
+ * holding the lock when we're not), but it will eventually catch
+ * any cases of entering here without the lock held.
+ */
+ if (!kernel_locked())
+ BUG();
+ unlock_kernel();
+
file.f_pos = offset;
oldfs = get_fs(); set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
err = file.f_op->read(&file, buf, *count, &file.f_pos);
set_fs(oldfs);
+ lock_kernel();
+
/* Write back readahead params */
if (ra != NULL) {
dprintk("nfsd: raparms %ld %ld %ld %ld %ld\n",
@@ -664,6 +681,22 @@
goto out_close;
#endif
+ /*
+ * The nfs daemons run holding the global kernel lock, but
+ * f_op->write() doesn't need the lock to be held.
+ * Also, as the struct file is private, the export is read-locked,
+ * and the inode attached to the dentry cannot change under us, the
+ * lock can be dropped ahead of the call to write() for even better
+ * scalability.
+ *
+ * The "kernel_locked()" test isn't perfect (someone else could be
+ * holding the lock when we're not), but it will eventually catch
+ * any cases of entering here without the lock held.
+ */
+ if (!kernel_locked())
+ BUG();
+ unlock_kernel();
+
dentry = file.f_dentry;
inode = dentry->d_inode;
exp = fhp->fh_export;
@@ -692,9 +725,12 @@
/* Write the data. */
oldfs = get_fs(); set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
err = file.f_op->write(&file, buf, cnt, &file.f_pos);
+ set_fs(oldfs);
+
+ lock_kernel();
+
if (err >= 0)
nfsdstats.io_write += cnt;
- set_fs(oldfs);
/* clear setuid/setgid flag after write */
if (err >= 0 && (inode->i_mode & (S_ISUID | S_ISGID))) {
next reply other threads:[~2001-02-18 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-18 20:17 Mark Hemment [this message]
2001-02-22 0:21 ` Neil Brown
2001-02-22 9:03 ` Mark Hemment
2001-02-23 5:45 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0102182007310.11260-200000@alloc \
--to=markhe@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®