mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan van Hienen <raid@a2000.nu>
To: Peter Chubb <peter@chubb.wattle.id.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	bernard@biesterbos.nl, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: raid5 2TB+ NO GO ?
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:39:14 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0302121129480.13462@ddx.a2000.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15945.31516.492846.870265@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au>

On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Peter Chubb wrote:

> >>>>> "Stephan" == Stephan van Hienen <raid@a2000.nu> writes:
>
> Stephan,
> 	Just noticed you're using raid5 --- I don't believe that level
> 5 will work, as its data structures and  internal algorithms are
> 32-bit only.  I've done no work on it to make it work (I've been
> waiting for the rewrite in 2.5), and don't have time to do anything now.
>
> You could try making sector in the struct stripe_head a sector_t, but
> I'm pretty sure you'll run into other problems.
>
> I only managed to get raid 0 and linear to work when I was testing.

ok clear, so no raid5 for 2TB+ then :(

looks like i have to remove some hd's then

what will be the limit ?

13*180GB in raid5 ?
or 12*180GB in raid5 ?

    Device Size : 175823296 (167.68 GiB 180.09 GB)

13* will give me 1,97TiB but will there be an internal raid5 problem ?
(since it will be 13*180GB to be adressed)



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-02-12 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.53.0302060059210.6169@ddx.a2000.nu>
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.53.0302060123150.6169@ddx.a2000.nu>
2003-02-06  1:13   ` 15 * 180gb in raid5 gives 299.49 GiB ? Stephan van Hienen
     [not found]     ` <15937.50001.367258.485512@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au>
2003-02-07 13:58       ` Stephan van Hienen
     [not found]         ` <15945.31516.492846.870265@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au>
2003-02-12 10:39           ` Stephan van Hienen [this message]
2003-02-12 15:13             ` raid5 2TB+ NO GO ? Mike Black
2003-02-14 10:21               ` kernel
2003-02-17 10:24                 ` Stephan van Hienen
2003-02-20 16:17                   ` what is the exact raid5 limit (2TB (can i use 12 or 13*180GB?)) Stephan van Hienen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.53.0302121129480.13462@ddx.a2000.nu \
    --to=raid@a2000.nu \
    --cc=bernard@biesterbos.nl \
    --cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter@chubb.wattle.id.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®