From: Stephan van Hienen <raid@a2000.nu>
To: kernel@ddx.a2000.nu
Cc: Mike Black <mblack@csi-inc.com>,
Peter Chubb <peter@chubb.wattle.id.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
bernard@biesterbos.nl, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: what is the exact raid5 limit (2TB (can i use 12 or 13*180GB?))
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 17:17:49 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0302201717020.4479@ddx.a2000.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0302171123480.2464@ddx.a2000.nu>
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Stephan van Hienen wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 kernel@ddx.a2000.nu wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Mike Black wrote:
> >
> > > I did a 12x180G and as I recall was unable to do 13x180G as it overflowed during mke2fs. This was a year ago though so I don't know
> > > if that's been improved since then.
> > >
> >
> > does anyone know for sure what is the limit for md raid5 ?
> >
> > can i use 13*180GB in raid5 ?
> > or should i go for 12*180GB in raid5 ?
I really want to create this raid this week
so is there anyone with info what will be the limit ?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-20 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.53.0302060059210.6169@ddx.a2000.nu>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.53.0302060123150.6169@ddx.a2000.nu>
2003-02-06 1:13 ` 15 * 180gb in raid5 gives 299.49 GiB ? Stephan van Hienen
[not found] ` <15937.50001.367258.485512@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au>
2003-02-07 13:58 ` Stephan van Hienen
[not found] ` <15945.31516.492846.870265@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au>
2003-02-12 10:39 ` raid5 2TB+ NO GO ? Stephan van Hienen
2003-02-12 15:13 ` Mike Black
2003-02-14 10:21 ` kernel
2003-02-17 10:24 ` Stephan van Hienen
2003-02-20 16:17 ` Stephan van Hienen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.53.0302201717020.4479@ddx.a2000.nu \
--to=raid@a2000.nu \
--cc=bernard@biesterbos.nl \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=kernel@ddx.a2000.nu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mblack@csi-inc.com \
--cc=peter@chubb.wattle.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®