From: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
To: Jakob Lell <jlell@JakobLell.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hard links create local DoS vulnerability and security problems
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:14:34 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0311241205500.18425@chaos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200311241736.23824.jlell@JakobLell.de>
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Jakob Lell wrote:
> Hello,
> on Linux it is possible for any user to create a hard link to a file belonging
> to another user. This hard link continues to exist even if the original file
> is removed by the owner. However, as the link still belongs to the original
> owner, it is still counted to his quota. If a malicious user creates hard
> links for every temp file created by another user, this can make the victim
> run out of quota (or even fill up the hard disk). This makes a local DoS
> attack possible.
>
You can create hard-links to any file that a user has given you
permission to read or execute. This is correct. The new hard-link
still belongs to the original user, which is also correct.
To prevent this, a user can set his default permissions so that
neither group nor world can read the files. This is usually done
by setting the attributes in the user's top directory.
> Furthermore, users can even create links to a setuid binary. If there is a
> security whole like a buffer overflow in any setuid binary, a cracker can
> create a hard link to this file in his home directory. This link still exists
> when the administrator has fixed the security whole by removing or replacing
> the insecure program. This makes it possible for a cracker to keep a security
> whole open until an exploit is available. It is even possible to create links
> to every setuid program on the system. This doesn't create new security
> wholes but makes it more likely that they are exploited.
>
A setuid binary created with a hard-link will only work as a setuid
binary if the directory it's in is owned by root. If you have users
that can create files or hard-links within such directories, you
have users who either know the root password already or have used
some exploit to become root. In any case, it's not a hard-link
problem
> To solve the problem, the kernel shouldn't allow users to create hard
> links to
> files belonging to someone else.
>
No. Users must be able to create hard links to files that belong
to somebody else if they are readable. It's a requirement.
Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.4.22 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
Note 96.31% of all statistics are fiction.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-24 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-24 16:36 Jakob Lell
2003-11-24 17:05 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-11-24 20:42 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-11-24 17:14 ` Richard B. Johnson [this message]
2003-11-24 17:35 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-11-24 18:57 ` aic7xxx loading oops in 2.6.0-test10 Alexander Nyberg
2003-11-24 20:03 ` Ken Witherow
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0311241524310.1245@morpheus>
2003-11-24 20:49 ` Ken Witherow
2003-11-24 23:42 ` Dick Streefland
2003-11-25 3:16 ` hard links create local DoS vulnerability and security problems Matthias Andree
2003-11-25 14:48 ` Jan Kara
2003-11-25 15:27 ` Jakob Lell
2003-11-24 17:37 ` Rudo Thomas
2003-11-24 18:10 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-11-24 18:22 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-11-24 22:17 ` [OT] " Rudo Thomas
2003-11-24 17:57 ` Jakob Lell
2003-11-24 18:08 ` splite
2003-11-24 18:13 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-11-24 18:24 ` Jakob Lell
2003-11-24 23:57 ` bill davidsen
2003-11-24 18:18 ` Jakob Lell
2003-11-24 18:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-11-24 19:25 ` hard links create local DoS vulnerability and security proble Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
2003-11-24 20:00 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-11-24 20:02 ` Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
2003-11-24 20:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-11-24 18:21 ` hard links create local DoS vulnerability and security problems Michael Buesch
2003-11-24 18:35 ` Jakob Lell
2003-11-24 18:53 ` Chris Wright
2003-11-25 0:04 ` bill davidsen
2003-11-25 13:54 ` Jesse Pollard
2003-11-24 23:50 ` bill davidsen
2003-11-25 0:22 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-11-25 0:35 ` Chris Wright
2003-11-25 8:15 ` Amon Ott
2003-11-25 16:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-11-25 11:26 ` Gianni Tedesco
[not found] <fa.hevpbbs.u5q2r6@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.l1quqni.v405hu@ifi.uio.no>
2003-11-24 20:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2003-11-24 21:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-24 23:28 ` Ricky Beam
2003-11-24 22:04 ` John Bradford
2003-11-24 22:12 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-11-25 12:10 ` John Bradford
2003-11-25 12:18 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-11-25 13:12 ` John Bradford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.53.0311241205500.18425@chaos \
--to=root@chaos.analogic.com \
--cc=jlell@JakobLell.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®