From: William Weston <weston@lysdexia.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:13:47 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0502091233360.4599@echo.lysdexia.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050209115121.GA13608@elte.hu>
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Running wmcube (an impractical, greedy, little CPU meter), even when
> > niced, causes lots of xruns. It may be good for worst-case-scenario
> > desktop load testing.
>
> this phenomenon is very weird.
>
> Firstly, make sure that all relevant threads (including the soundcard
> IRQ thread, jackd threads, jack client thread, etc.) have higher RT
> priority than any other, latency-irrelevant threads in the system.
Thanks for the tip. I have schedtool installed, and all audio/MIDI IRQ
threads, jack threads, and jack clients are now run with higher priorities
than everything else. Before I adjusted priorities, I was getting a bunch
of these when running latencytest (which have since disappeared):
rtc: lost some interrupts at 8192Hz.
bug in rtc_read(): called in state S_IDLE!
IRQ 8 (RTC) is still giving me some issues, even after adjusting
priorities:
`IRQ 8'[232] is being piggy. need_resched=0, cpu=0
Read missed before next interrupt
Should the RTC IRQ be given a new priority? If so, should it be lower,
higher, or equal to the audio/MIDI/jack priorities?
> If everything looks OK on the priority-administration side, could you
> enable wakeup-latency tracing via:
>
> CONFIG_WAKEUP_TIMING=y
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACE=y
> # CONFIG_CRITICAL_PREEMPT_TIMING is not set
> # CONFIG_CRITICAL_IRQSOFF_TIMING is not set
> CONFIG_LATENCY_TIMING=y
> CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACE=y
<snip>
> what is the longest wakeup latency the tracer shows? You can start the
> measurement anew via:
>
> echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/preempt_max_latency
Max latency is in the realm of 13-18 after runs of jack_test4.1.
> every new maximum-latency event will be logged by the kernel, and the
> trace of the latest worst-case latency path can be found under
> /proc/latency_trace.
>
> (If the trace is very long then most of the time it's OK to just send
> the first 25 and last 10 lines. Putting the trace up to a website is a
> good solution too.)
See http://www.sysex.net/testing/ for the all of the test results and
system info on a 2.6.11-rc3-RT-V0.7.38-06 kernel.
This is from my most recent run of jack_test4.1 with wmcube and kernel
compilation running (check /testing/dmesg for more):
( sshd-5940 |#0): new 4 s maximum-latency wakeup.
( IRQ 16-1803 |#0): new 5 s maximum-latency wakeup.
( make-28375|#0): new 6 s maximum-latency wakeup.
( ksoftirqd/0-2 |#0): new 6 s maximum-latency wakeup.
( ksoftirqd/0-2 |#0): new 7 s maximum-latency wakeup.
( ksoftirqd/0-2 |#0): new 8 s maximum-latency wakeup.
( ksoftirqd/0-2 |#0): new 8 s maximum-latency wakeup.
( ksoftirqd/0-2 |#0): new 9 s maximum-latency wakeup.
( ksoftirqd/0-2 |#0): new 10 s maximum-latency wakeup.
( ksoftirqd/0-2 |#0): new 10 s maximum-latency wakeup.
( jackd-29348|#0): new 12 s maximum-latency wakeup.
( jackd-29348|#0): new 14 s maximum-latency wakeup.
( jackd-29348|#0): new 15 s maximum-latency wakeup.
> it should not matter how 'greedy' wmcube is. Does it do alot of graphics
> activity (perhaps 3D too?) - that could in theory cause hardware
> latencies - the latency traces will tell.
Wmcube displays a 3D spinning cube, which spins faster (actually performs
larger rotations between updates) when CPU usage goes up. When running
niced, wmcube uses about 1% to 4% of the CPU, adds about 1000 context
switches per second, and increases X load by 1% to 3% of the total CPU.
Now that the priorities are tuned, I get no xruns while running wmcube,
compiling a kernel, and running latencytest or jack_test4.1.
> > MIDI playback through any MPU-401 interface triggers the following
> > BUG, reported once for each outgoing MIDI event (non MPU-401 hw
> > interfaces and sw interfaces not affected):
>
> the patch below should fix this. (also included in -38-06 and later
> kernels.)
>
> Ingo
>
> --- linux/sound/drivers/mpu401/mpu401_uart.c.orig
> +++ linux/sound/drivers/mpu401/mpu401_uart.c
> @@ -316,12 +316,12 @@ static void snd_mpu401_uart_input_trigge
> /* read data in advance */
> /* prevent double enter via rawmidi->event callback */
> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mpu->rx_loop)) {
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> + local_irq_save_nort(flags);
> if (spin_trylock(&mpu->input_lock)) {
> snd_mpu401_uart_input_read(mpu);
> spin_unlock(&mpu->input_lock);
> }
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> + local_irq_restore_nort(flags);
> }
> atomic_inc(&mpu->rx_loop);
> } else {
> @@ -407,12 +407,12 @@ static void snd_mpu401_uart_output_trigg
> /* output pending data */
> /* prevent double enter via rawmidi->event callback */
> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mpu->tx_loop)) {
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> + local_irq_save_nort(flags);
> if (spin_trylock(&mpu->output_lock)) {
> snd_mpu401_uart_output_write(mpu);
> spin_unlock(&mpu->output_lock);
> }
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> + local_irq_restore_nort(flags);
> }
> atomic_inc(&mpu->tx_loop);
> } else {
This patch does fix the MIDI playback BUG I was seeing.
Best Regards,
--William Weston <weston at sysex.net>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-10 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 125+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-04 10:03 Ingo Molnar
2005-02-04 15:19 ` Kevin Hilman
2005-02-04 17:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-04 18:19 ` Tom Rini
2005-02-07 9:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-07 14:35 ` Tom Rini
2005-02-08 8:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-06 4:19 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-02-07 9:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-07 15:08 ` Real-Time Preemption and UML? Esben Nielsen
2005-02-07 18:35 ` Jeff Dike
2005-02-07 23:14 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-02-08 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-08 18:55 ` Jeff Dike
2005-02-08 21:20 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-02-08 21:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-08 23:02 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-02-08 7:55 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01 Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-02-08 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-08 10:26 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-02-08 21:58 ` William Weston
2005-02-09 11:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-10 2:13 ` William Weston [this message]
2005-02-10 7:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-10 20:21 ` George Anzinger
2005-02-10 20:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-10 21:05 ` George Anzinger
2005-02-11 8:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-11 9:38 ` Sven Dietrich
2005-02-11 9:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-11 0:09 ` Sven Dietrich
2005-02-11 6:01 ` George Anzinger
2005-02-11 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-11 9:53 ` Sven Dietrich
2005-02-11 10:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-11 21:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-02-13 12:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-13 15:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-03 19:36 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, deactivate() scheduling issue Eugeny S. Mints
2005-03-03 22:32 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-03-04 11:56 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2005-03-04 15:45 ` George Anzinger
2005-03-29 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-09 12:48 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01 Stephen Smalley
2005-02-10 2:20 ` William Weston
2005-02-19 5:08 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-19 6:47 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-19 9:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-19 9:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-19 20:45 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-20 0:19 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-17 16:33 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-23 2:22 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-10 9:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-10 9:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-11 10:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 10:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-11 10:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 10:43 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-11 10:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 14:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 15:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 15:30 ` K.R. Foley
2005-03-11 15:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-11 16:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 20:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 20:46 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-11 22:06 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-14 7:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-14 9:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-14 10:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-14 15:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-14 19:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-15 11:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-15 12:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-15 13:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-15 13:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-15 13:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-15 19:12 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-15 18:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-15 19:09 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-16 7:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 18:21 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-16 7:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 8:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 9:15 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 9:51 ` [patch 0/3] j_state_lock, j_list_lock, remove-bitlocks Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 9:53 ` [patch 1/3] j_state_lock -> j_state_sem Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 9:53 ` [patch 2/3] j_list_lock -> j_list_sem Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 9:57 ` [patch 3/3] remove bitlocks Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 10:04 ` [patch 0/3] j_state_lock, j_list_lock, remove-bitlocks Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 10:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 10:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 10:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 10:26 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 10:41 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 10:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-03-16 10:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 10:40 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 10:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 11:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 11:19 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 14:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 16:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 17:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 19:20 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-17 7:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-17 15:41 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-17 16:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-17 16:36 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-18 6:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-18 18:19 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-16 21:15 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-17 9:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-18 9:23 ` [PATCH] remove lame schedule in journal inverted_lock (was: Re: [patch 0/3] j_state_lock, j_list_lock, remove-bitlocks) Steven Rostedt
2005-03-18 9:32 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-18 10:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-18 11:07 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-18 12:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-17 9:58 ` [patch 0/3] j_state_lock, j_list_lock, remove-bitlocks Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 9:28 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-final-V0.7.40-00 Ingo Molnar
2005-03-11 12:10 ` Andrew Walrond
2005-03-14 20:19 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0502091233360.4599@echo.lysdexia.org \
--to=weston@lysdexia.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®