From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, rlrevell@joe-job.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:40:08 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0503110754240.19798@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050311024322.690eb3a9.akpm@osdl.org>
Here's the patch. It's probably more of an overkill wrt buffer heads, but
it seems to be the easiest solution.
I also put back some of the changes you made for the
bit_spin_locks, so that they act the same as the vanilla kernel if
PREEMPT_RT is not defined. Now I only tested this with PREEMPT_RT
configured so I hope others can test it with it off. If I get time I'll do
that as well.
I patched this against linux-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02, so I hope it goes
easily into .40.
Lee,
Could you see what the latencies are with kjournal with this patch
applied.
Thanks,
-- Steve
diff -ur linux-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02.orig/fs/buffer.c linux-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02/fs/buffer.c
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02.orig/fs/buffer.c 2005-02-12 22:06:54.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02/fs/buffer.c 2005-03-11 07:48:04.000000000 -0500
@@ -3002,6 +3002,10 @@
preempt_disable();
__get_cpu_var(bh_accounting).nr++;
recalc_bh_state();
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+ spin_lock_init(&ret->b_jstate_lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&ret->b_jhead_lock);
+#endif
preempt_enable();
}
return ret;
diff -ur linux-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02.orig/include/linux/buffer_head.h linux-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02/include/linux/buffer_head.h
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02.orig/include/linux/buffer_head.h 2005-02-12 22:05:10.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02/include/linux/buffer_head.h 2005-03-11 07:59:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -62,6 +62,14 @@
bh_end_io_t *b_end_io; /* I/O completion */
void *b_private; /* reserved for b_end_io */
struct list_head b_assoc_buffers; /* associated with another mapping */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+ /*
+ * Fixme: This should be in the journal code.
+ */
+ spinlock_t b_jstate_lock; /* lock for journal state. */
+ spinlock_t b_jhead_lock; /* lock for journal head. */
+#endif
};
/*
diff -ur linux-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02.orig/include/linux/jbd.h linux-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02/include/linux/jbd.h
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02.orig/include/linux/jbd.h 2005-02-12 22:07:18.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02/include/linux/jbd.h 2005-03-11 07:57:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -314,6 +314,12 @@
TAS_BUFFER_FNS(RevokeValid, revokevalid)
BUFFER_FNS(Freed, freed)
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+#define PICK_SPIN_LOCK(otype,bit,name) spin_##otype(&bh->b_##name##_lock)
+#else
+#define PICK_SPIN_LOCK(otype,bit,name) bit_spin_##otype(bit,bh->b_state);
+#endif
+
static inline struct buffer_head *jh2bh(struct journal_head *jh)
{
return jh->b_bh;
@@ -326,33 +332,34 @@
static inline void jbd_lock_bh_state(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- bit_spin_lock(BH_State, &bh->b_state);
+ PICK_SPIN_LOCK(lock,BH_State,jstate);
}
static inline int jbd_trylock_bh_state(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- return bit_spin_trylock(BH_State, &bh->b_state);
+ return PICK_SPIN_LOCK(trylock,BH_State,jstate);
}
static inline int jbd_is_locked_bh_state(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- return bit_spin_is_locked(BH_State, &bh->b_state);
+ return PICK_SPIN_LOCK(is_locked,BH_State,jstate);
}
static inline void jbd_unlock_bh_state(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- bit_spin_unlock(BH_State, &bh->b_state);
+ PICK_SPIN_LOCK(unlock,BH_State,jstate);
}
static inline void jbd_lock_bh_journal_head(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- bit_spin_lock(BH_JournalHead, &bh->b_state);
+ PICK_SPIN_LOCK(lock,BH_JournalHead,jhead);
}
static inline void jbd_unlock_bh_journal_head(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- bit_spin_unlock(BH_JournalHead, &bh->b_state);
+ PICK_SPIN_LOCK(unlock,BH_JournalHead,jhead);
}
+#undef PICK_SPIN_LOCK
struct jbd_revoke_table_s;
diff -ur linux-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02.orig/include/linux/spinlock.h linux-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02/include/linux/spinlock.h
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02.orig/include/linux/spinlock.h 2005-03-10 08:47:25.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-V0.7.39-02/include/linux/spinlock.h 2005-03-11 09:06:26.254317378 -0500
@@ -774,6 +774,10 @@
}))
+#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+
+/* These are just plain evil! */
+
/*
* bit-based spin_lock()
*
@@ -789,10 +793,15 @@
* busywait with less bus contention for a good time to
* attempt to acquire the lock bit.
*/
-#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT)
- while (test_and_set_bit(bitnum, addr))
- while (test_bit(bitnum, addr))
+ preempt_disable();
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK)
+ while (test_and_set_bit(bitnum, addr)) {
+ while (test_bit(bitnum, addr)) {
+ preempt_enable();
cpu_relax();
+ preempt_disable();
+ }
+ }
#endif
__acquire(bitlock);
}
@@ -802,9 +811,12 @@
*/
static inline int bit_spin_trylock(int bitnum, unsigned long *addr)
{
-#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT)
- if (test_and_set_bit(bitnum, addr))
+ preempt_disable();
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK)
+ if (test_and_set_bit(bitnum, addr)) {
+ preempt_enable();
return 0;
+ }
#endif
__acquire(bitlock);
return 1;
@@ -815,11 +827,12 @@
*/
static inline void bit_spin_unlock(int bitnum, unsigned long *addr)
{
-#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT)
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK)
BUG_ON(!test_bit(bitnum, addr));
smp_mb__before_clear_bit();
clear_bit(bitnum, addr);
#endif
+ preempt_enable();
__release(bitlock);
}
@@ -828,12 +841,15 @@
*/
static inline int bit_spin_is_locked(int bitnum, unsigned long *addr)
{
-#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT)
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK)
return test_bit(bitnum, addr);
+#elif defined CONFIG_PREEMPT
+ return preempt_count();
#else
return 1;
#endif
}
+#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
#define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(name) \
spinlock_t name __cacheline_aligned_in_smp = _SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-11 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 125+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-04 10:03 Ingo Molnar
2005-02-04 15:19 ` Kevin Hilman
2005-02-04 17:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-04 18:19 ` Tom Rini
2005-02-07 9:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-07 14:35 ` Tom Rini
2005-02-08 8:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-06 4:19 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-02-07 9:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-07 15:08 ` Real-Time Preemption and UML? Esben Nielsen
2005-02-07 18:35 ` Jeff Dike
2005-02-07 23:14 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-02-08 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-08 18:55 ` Jeff Dike
2005-02-08 21:20 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-02-08 21:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-08 23:02 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-02-08 7:55 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01 Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-02-08 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-08 10:26 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-02-08 21:58 ` William Weston
2005-02-09 11:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-10 2:13 ` William Weston
2005-02-10 7:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-10 20:21 ` George Anzinger
2005-02-10 20:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-10 21:05 ` George Anzinger
2005-02-11 8:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-11 9:38 ` Sven Dietrich
2005-02-11 9:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-11 0:09 ` Sven Dietrich
2005-02-11 6:01 ` George Anzinger
2005-02-11 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-11 9:53 ` Sven Dietrich
2005-02-11 10:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-11 21:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-02-13 12:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-13 15:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-03 19:36 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, deactivate() scheduling issue Eugeny S. Mints
2005-03-03 22:32 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-03-04 11:56 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2005-03-04 15:45 ` George Anzinger
2005-03-29 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-09 12:48 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01 Stephen Smalley
2005-02-10 2:20 ` William Weston
2005-02-19 5:08 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-19 6:47 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-19 9:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-19 9:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-19 20:45 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-20 0:19 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-17 16:33 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-23 2:22 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-10 9:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-10 9:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-11 10:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 10:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-11 10:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 10:43 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-11 10:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 14:40 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2005-03-11 15:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 15:30 ` K.R. Foley
2005-03-11 15:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-11 16:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 20:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 20:46 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-11 22:06 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-14 7:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-14 9:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-14 10:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-14 15:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-14 19:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-15 11:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-15 12:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-15 13:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-15 13:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-15 13:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-15 19:12 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-15 18:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-15 19:09 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-16 7:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 18:21 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-16 7:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 8:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 9:15 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 9:51 ` [patch 0/3] j_state_lock, j_list_lock, remove-bitlocks Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 9:53 ` [patch 1/3] j_state_lock -> j_state_sem Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 9:53 ` [patch 2/3] j_list_lock -> j_list_sem Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 9:57 ` [patch 3/3] remove bitlocks Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 10:04 ` [patch 0/3] j_state_lock, j_list_lock, remove-bitlocks Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 10:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 10:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 10:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 10:26 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 10:41 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 10:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-03-16 10:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 10:40 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 10:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 11:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 11:19 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 14:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 16:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 17:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 19:20 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-17 7:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-17 15:41 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-17 16:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-17 16:36 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-18 6:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-18 18:19 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-16 21:15 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-17 9:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-18 9:23 ` [PATCH] remove lame schedule in journal inverted_lock (was: Re: [patch 0/3] j_state_lock, j_list_lock, remove-bitlocks) Steven Rostedt
2005-03-18 9:32 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-18 10:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-18 11:07 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-18 12:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-17 9:58 ` [patch 0/3] j_state_lock, j_list_lock, remove-bitlocks Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 9:28 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-final-V0.7.40-00 Ingo Molnar
2005-03-11 12:10 ` Andrew Walrond
2005-03-14 20:19 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0503110754240.19798@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®