mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@speakeasy.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Satyam Sharma <ssatyam@cse.iitk.ac.in>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] i386: bitops: Kill needless usage of __asm__ __volatile__
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:06:45 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0707231405400.5535@shell2.speakeasy.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46A51254.8000508@goop.org>

On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Trent Piepho wrote:
> > gcc also tries to count the number of instructions, to guess how large in
> > bytes the asm block is, as it could make a difference for near vs short
> > jumps, etc.
> >
>
> How does it do that?  By looking for \n, ';', etc?

Yes:

    Some targets require that GCC track the size of each instruction used in
    order to generate correct code.  Because the final length of an `asm' is
    only known by the assembler, GCC must make an estimate as to how big it
    will be.  The estimate is formed by counting the number of statements in
    the pattern of the `asm' and multiplying that by the length of the longest
    instruction on that processor.  Statements in the `asm' are identified by
    newline characters and whatever statement separator characters are
    supported by the assembler; on most processors this is the ``;''
    character.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-23 21:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-23 16:05 [PATCH 0/8] i386: bitops: Cleanup, sanitize, optimize Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:05 ` [PATCH 1/8] i386: bitops: Update/correct comments Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:05 ` [PATCH 2/8] i386: bitops: Rectify bogus "Ir" constraints Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:10   ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 16:21     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:30       ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 16:36         ` Jan Hubicka
2007-07-23 18:05         ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-23 18:28           ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-23 17:57   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-23 18:14     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 18:32       ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 18:39     ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-23 18:52       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:05 ` [PATCH 3/8] i386: bitops: Rectify bogus "+m" constraints Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:37   ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 17:15     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 17:46   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24  9:22   ` David Howells
2007-07-23 16:05 ` [PATCH 4/8] i386: bitops: Kill volatile-casting of memory addresses Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 17:52   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24  4:19     ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24  6:23       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-24  7:16         ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24  9:49     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-24 17:20       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24 17:39         ` Jeff Garzik
2007-07-25  4:54         ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-23 16:05 ` [PATCH 5/8] i386: bitops: Contain warnings fallout from the death of volatiles Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:05 ` [PATCH 6/8] i386: bitops: Don't mark memory as clobbered unnecessarily Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:13   ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 16:26     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:33       ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 17:12         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 17:49           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-23 17:55   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24  9:52     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-24 17:24       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24 17:42         ` Trond Myklebust
2007-07-24 18:13           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24 18:28             ` Trond Myklebust
2007-07-24 21:37             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-24 21:55               ` Trond Myklebust
2007-07-24 22:32                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-25  4:10                   ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24 21:36         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-24  3:57   ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24  6:38     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-24  7:24       ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24  8:29         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-24  8:39           ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24  8:38         ` Trent Piepho
2007-07-24 19:39           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24 20:37             ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-24 20:08               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24 21:31                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-24 21:46                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-26  1:07             ` Trent Piepho
2007-07-26  1:18               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-26  1:22                 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24  9:44     ` David Howells
2007-07-24 10:02       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:06 ` [PATCH 7/8] i386: bitops: Kill needless usage of __asm__ __volatile__ Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:18   ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 16:22     ` [PATCH 7/8] i386: bitops: Kill needless usage of __asm__ __volatile__ II Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 16:32     ` [PATCH 7/8] i386: bitops: Kill needless usage of __asm__ __volatile__ Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:23   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-23 16:43     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 17:39       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-23 18:07         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 18:28           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-23 20:29             ` Trent Piepho
2007-07-23 20:40               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-23 21:06                 ` Trent Piepho [this message]
2007-07-23 21:30               ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 21:48                 ` Nicholas Miell
2007-07-23 16:06 ` [PATCH 8/8] i386: bitops: smp_mb__{before, after}_clear_bit() definitions Satyam Sharma
2007-07-24  3:53   ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24  7:34     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-24  7:48       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-24  8:31         ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24  8:20       ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24  9:21         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-24 10:25           ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24 11:10             ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-24 11:32               ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24 11:45                 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-24 12:01                   ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24 17:12                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24 19:01                     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-30 17:57 ` [PATCH 0/8] i386: bitops: Cleanup, sanitize, optimize Denis Vlasenko
2007-07-31  1:07   ` Satyam Sharma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0707231405400.5535@shell2.speakeasy.net \
    --to=xyzzy@speakeasy.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=ssatyam@cse.iitk.ac.in \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®