* [PATCH] ext2: update inode ctime on rename()
@ 2004-02-05 13:47 Marcelo Tosatti
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Marcelo Tosatti @ 2004-02-05 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: torvalds, tytso, sct; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel
Hi,
Chris Siebenmann posted a fix to update the old inode ctime on rename().
This fix went into 2.2.13, but did not make into 2.4 or 2.6 kernels (the
2.2.13 diff is at the end of this message).
Here is updated 2.6 version without mark_inode_dirty(), which is not
necessary anymore because its called by "ext2_dec_count()" few lines
down.
--- a/linux-2.6.1/fs/ext2/namei.c 2004-01-09 04:59:56.000000000 -0200
+++ linux-2.6.1/fs/ext2/namei.c 2004-02-05 11:44:05.922691472 -0200
@@ -356,6 +356,13 @@
ext2_inc_count(new_dir);
}
+ /*
+ * Like most other Unix systems, set the ctime for inodes on a
+ * rename.
+ * ext2_dec_count() will mark the inode dirty.
+ */
+ old_inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
+
ext2_delete_entry (old_de, old_page);
ext2_dec_count(old_inode);
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> Ext2 in 2.2.13+ updates the ctime of an inode on rename(), but this fix
> didn't make it into 2.4. Other filesystems (including ext3) do update
> inode ctime on rename in 2.4, and failure to do so makes various backup
> tools skip backing up renamed files during incremental backups. Here is
> the very simple patch to fix this.
>
> My earlier message to linux-kernel and ext2-devel has a longer
> discussion of the situation; you can find it at
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0401.1/0594.html
> (Or with the original subject in a local archive of linux-kernel).
> It hasn't gotten any replies, which may or may not be a good sign.
>
> Because I feel that not capturing renamed files in incremental
> backups is a fairly severe issue, I urge you to apply this patch
> to 2.4. It's run here on several systems for quite a while without
> apparent problems.
>
> ===== fs/ext2/namei.c 1.3 vs edited =====
> --- 1.3/fs/ext2/namei.c Tue Feb 5 02:41:03 2002
> +++ edited/fs/ext2/namei.c Wed Dec 10 17:13:30 2003
> @@ -313,6 +313,13 @@
> ext2_inc_count(new_dir);
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Like most other Unix systems, set the ctime for inodes on a
> + * rename.
> + */
> + old_inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
> + mark_inode_dirty(old_inode); /* still necessary? */
> +
> ext2_delete_entry (old_de, old_page);
> ext2_dec_count(old_inode);
The 2.2 fix:
diff -u --recursive --new-file v2.2.12/linux/fs/ext2/namei.c
linux/fs/ext2/namei.c
--- v2.2.12/linux/fs/ext2/namei.c Thu May 13 23:25:58 1999
+++ linux/fs/ext2/namei.c Tue Oct 19 17:14:01 1999
@@ -883,6 +883,13 @@
new_dir->i_version = ++event;
/*
+ * Like most other Unix systems, set the ctime for inodes on a
+ * rename.
+ */
+ old_inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
+ mark_inode_dirty(old_inode);
+
+ /*
* ok, that's it
*/
new_de->inode = le32_to_cpu(old_inode->i_ino);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-02-05 13:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-05 13:47 [PATCH] ext2: update inode ctime on rename() Marcelo Tosatti
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®