From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@diku.dk>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:55:30 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0607101235430.2378@ask.diku.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200607041354.22472.ak@suse.de>
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 July 2006 13:41, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>>
>> Actually the change happens between kernel version 2.6.15 and 2.6.16.
>
> The timestamp optimizations are older. Don't remember the exact release,
> but earlier 2.6.
What I'm saying is that, with the same Config file, some Kconfig option
changed between 2.6.15 and 2.6.16, that made my system use pmtmr for high-res
timesource instead of TSC.
>> And
>> is a result of Andi's changes to arch/x86_64/Kconfig and
>> drivers/acpi/Kconfig, which "allows/activates" the use of the timer on
>> x86_64.
>
> Not sure what you mean here?
I think, that the changes you made to the files "arch/x86_64/Kconfig" and
"drivers/acpi/Kconfig", caused this change...
commit: e78256b8f3e2850ad55c2d69e1429e6c2607afd3
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.17.y.git;a=commitdiff;h=e78256b8f3e2850ad55c2d69e1429e6c2607afd3
and maybe
commit: 2eb1bdbad89b19c99f8ac1de1492cdabbff6b3d3
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.17.y.git;a=commitdiff;h=2eb1bdbad89b19c99f8ac1de1492cdabbff6b3d3
Hilsen
Jesper Brouer
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
MSc. Master of Computer Science
Dept. of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen
Author of http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk
-------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-10 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-16 16:01 Harry Edmon
2006-06-17 22:35 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-17 23:23 ` Harry Edmon
2006-06-17 23:56 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-18 3:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-06-18 23:23 ` Harry Edmon
2006-06-19 13:54 ` Harry Edmon
2006-06-20 2:11 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-19 14:47 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2006-06-19 15:24 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-19 17:34 ` Chris Friesen
2006-06-19 20:39 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-19 18:24 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2006-06-25 21:51 ` Harry Edmon
2006-06-26 4:20 ` Bill Fink
2006-06-25 22:22 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-06-26 5:23 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-04 11:41 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2006-07-04 11:54 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-10 10:55 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2006-09-16 12:08 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2006-09-18 8:35 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 9:03 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2006-09-18 9:58 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 10:29 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2006-09-18 11:27 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 15:38 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-09-18 15:54 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 16:28 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-09-18 16:50 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 21:03 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-09-18 21:22 ` David Miller
2006-09-18 21:46 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-09-19 5:55 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-19 20:31 ` Thomas Graf
2006-09-19 20:43 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-19 5:52 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 21:18 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2006-09-18 22:00 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-09-18 21:57 ` David Lang
2006-09-19 19:40 ` David Miller
2006-09-19 19:44 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-09-18 22:03 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2006-09-19 19:41 ` David Miller
2006-09-19 19:47 ` David Miller
2006-09-22 15:35 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-09-22 15:43 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-22 16:51 ` Rick Jones
2007-03-06 13:25 ` Packet timestamps (was: Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20) Vladimir B. Savkin
2007-03-06 14:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-06 14:43 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2007-03-06 15:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-06 18:15 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2006-09-18 21:08 ` Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20 Vladimir B. Savkin
2006-09-18 14:09 ` David Miller
2006-09-18 14:29 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 15:19 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-18 15:19 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-19 16:40 ` Harry Edmon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0607101235430.2378@ask.diku.dk \
--to=hawk@diku.dk \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®